Mark and Seth continue our conversation from\xa0ep. 198\xa0by going through the arguments in the second half of the dialogue.
This puzzling section is largely a monologue by the character Parmenides, with the stated aim of showing the implications from first, the assumption that the One exists, and then that the One does not exist. But is this really Parmenides\u2019s One or the Platonic Form of Oneness? Can these be the same thing?