BROADCASTS.com

b'It\'s more Clueless than Blade but it sure ain\'t The Lost Boys. I still believe, though.\\r\\n\\r\\n"Vamps," the 2012 movie starring Alicia Silverstone and Krysten Ritter, offers a refreshing and somewhat quirky take on the vampire genre. While it may not be everyone\'s cup of tea (including 1/3 of Stinker Madness), it certainly has its charm, thanks to its unique spin on vampires trying to navigate the complexities of human life while grappling with their immortality.\\r\\n\\r\\nOne of the most intriguing aspects of "Vamps" is its exploration of vampires living among humans. The film delves into the challenges these immortal creatures face as they strive to maintain their humanity, all while looking eternally youthful. It\'s a clever and thought-provoking twist on the typical vampire lore, and it adds depth to the characters\' struggles and dilemmas.\\r\\n\\r\\nAlicia Silverstone and Krysten Ritter deliver charismatic performances that inject humor and relatability into their vampire characters. Their chemistry on screen makes the movie engaging and enjoyable to watch. Their characters are trying to find the balance between dating, maintaining friendships, and having fun while being eternally 21, which adds a humorous and relatable dimension to the story.\\r\\n\\r\\nHowever, it\'s important to note that "Vamps" does have its flaws. The visual effects, even for a 2012 film, leave much to be desired. Some of the special effects may come across as cheesy and dated, which can be distracting at times. Additionally, the film\'s offbeat humor and unique premise may not resonate with everyone, as it diverges from the traditional vampire narrative.\\r\\n\\r\\nIf you\'re a fan of unconventional vampire stories and don\'t mind some dated visuals, "Vamps" might be worth a watch for its fresh perspective on the genre. Its worth your time if you like "Girls Just Want to Have Fun", "Romy and Michelle" or obviously "Clueless".'