- Culture
- SEE MORE
- classical
- general
- talk
- News
- Family
- Bürgerfunk
- pop
- Islam
- soul
- jazz
- Comedy
- humor
- wissenschaft
- opera
- baroque
- gesellschaft
- theater
- Local
- alternative
- electro
- rock
- rap
- lifestyle
- Music
- como
- RNE
- ballads
- greek
- Buddhism
- deportes
- christian
- Technology
- piano
- djs
- Dance
- dutch
- flamenco
- social
- hope
- christian rock
- academia
- afrique
- Business
- musique
- ελληνική-μουσική
- religion
- World radio
- Zarzuela
- travel
- World
- NFL
- media
- Art
- public
- Sports
- Gospel
- st.
- baptist
- Leisure
- Kids & Family
- musical
- club
- Health & Fitness
- True Crime
- Fiction
- children
- Society & Culture
- TV & Film
- gold
- kunst
- música
- gay
- Natural
- a
- francais
- bach
- economics
- kultur
- evangelical
- tech
- Opinion
- Government
- gaming
- College
- technik
- History
- Jesus
- Health
- movies
- radio
- services
- Church
- podcast
- Education
- international
- Transportation
- Other
- kids
- podcasts
- philadelphia
- Noticias
- love
- sport
- Salud
- film
- and
- 4chan
- Disco
- Stories
- fashion
- Arts
- interviews
- hardstyle
- entertainment
- humour
- medieval
- literature
- alma
- Cultura
- video
- TV
- Science
- en
Can You Separate The Art From The Artist?
What are we to do with the books, movies, songs and performances created by some of society's most iconic artists who have later been exposed for certain wrongdoings? Is it enough to denounce them? Or must we reject their art as well? How do we separate the art from the artist? Or perhaps more importantly, should we separate the art from the artist? Vox.com critic Constance Grady joins the podcast.