BROADCASTS.com

b'

We\\u2019d probably all be able to give the government a score out of ten for its handling of the pandemic \\u2013 but how many of us have even thought of subjecting ourselves to the same level of scrutiny? From illegal raves, house parties and large family weddings to the everyday decisions not to wear a mask or socially distance, how much should the public take a share of the responsibility for the spread of the virus? The author and commentator Matthew Syed claims that personal responsibility is \\u201cin retreat\\u201d. Citing a new drug to tackle obesity by hijacking the brain\\u2019s appetite-regulating system \\u2013 while evidently good news \\u2013 he cautions against the pernicious effects of easy fixes on human character and our sense of self. When a homeless person dies on the streets, many will view that tragedy as a \\u201cfailure of the system\\u201d, and it would be unpopular to suggest the cause lies, even in small part, with the individual. Yet, individual autonomy is today\\u2019s sacred creed and it\\u2019s argued that with rights come responsibilities. Others believe there is a flaw in that logic because, as the pandemic has shown, we don\\u2019t all have the same resources or enjoy the freedom to pursue our lives as we would choose; that we are all products of our social background and no choice is made in a vacuum. What has our response to the pandemic revealed about the value we place in personal responsibility compared to other countries and cultures? Have we made too much or too little of the idea? And what does this tell us about how we should be tackling all kinds of social issues? Does an emphasis on free will, choice and responsibility help us to understand them better, or can it obscure what\\u2019s really going on? With Prof Sally Bloomfield, Dr Alexander Brown, Dr Deepti Gurdasani and Prof Sir Michael Marmot.

Producer: Dan Tierney.