Why computer chips have major geopolitical and national-security implications (with Chris Miller)

Published: March 15, 2022, 11 a.m.

b'

Should US semiconductor chip manufacturers move their fabrication plants onto American soil? Should we be offering migration incentives for high-tech chip engineers from Taiwan in order to onshore design and engineering? What role, if at all, should the government play in subsidizing the construction of these plants for US companies? These and other questions remain unsettled when it comes to the geopolitical challenges around semiconductor design, production, and trade.

On this episode of \\u201cExplain to Shane,\\u201d Shane and AEI Senior Fellow Claude Barfield reunite for a joint conversation with Chris Miller \\u2014 a new Jeane Kirkpatrick Fellow in AEI\\u2019s Foreign and Defense Policy department. Chris is also an assistant professor at Tufts University\\u2019s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, and directs the Eurasia program at the Foreign Policy Research Institute (FPRI). Chris recently published an FPRI report titled \\u201cLabs over fabs: How the US should invest in the future of semiconductors,\\u201d and will be releasing a book on the geopolitical history of semiconductors this year. His work frequently appears in national news outlets and opinion columns \\u2014 including Foreign Affairs and The New York Times.

Chris joins the podcast to discuss his expansive portfolio on the semiconductor industry, Congress\\u2019 attempts to guide US chip production, and how chip manufacturing is indefinitely tied to national security. 

'