In last week's show we discussed the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the fact that its existence is premised on the belief that there are human rights which transcend any culture, state, government etc. The ICC also seems to presume that taking human rights serious requires us to hold accountable those who are most responsible for the violation of these rights. However, some argue that holding wrongdoers accountable can actually "fan the flames", exacerbate tensions, and disrupt peace negotiations in conflict ridden areas. This disagreement will have us conversing about how peace is best perpetuated and made to last. Is it practical to have peace be maintained through peaceful means? If peace is the ultimate goal for which we should be striving, do arrest warrants and criminal trials impede this goal? Are arrest warrants issued by the international community necessary to attain peace, or are other methods available?