Podcasts religion Counter Apologetics CA79 Paul Drapers Case for Naturalism

CA79 Paul Drapers Case for Naturalism

Published: Dec. 1, 2020, 5 a.m.

b'In his 1997 debate with William Lane Craig, Paul Draper considers seven lines of evidence and asks if they are more expected on theism or on naturalism. He argues that the meager moral fruits of theism, mind-brain dependence, evolution, the biological role of pain and pleasure, tragedies, divine silence during tragedies, and religious confusion are \\u2026 Continue reading CA79 Paul Draper\\u2019s Case for Naturalism \\u2192'