BROADCASTS.com

b'Following the 2014 Google Spain decision rendered by the European Court of Justice of the European Union, search engines \\u2013 and, first among them, Google \\u2013 are tasked with the delisting of search results leading to outdated or inaccurate information about European citizens. This \\u2018right to be delisted\\u2019 has since then revealed itself as a highly controversial concept, raising issues such as the desired degree of protection of personal data over the Internet and the role of the act of forgetting in the digital age; it also highlighted the lack of an existing consensus over these questions between individual jurisdictions \\u2013 and namely between the European Union and the United States.\\n\\nOn 14 April 2016, the European Parliament has adopted the General Data Protection Regulation, which will, in two years from now, update and harmonize data protection law all across the Member States of the European Union. Its article 17 contains a \\u2018right to erasure\\u2019 or a \\u2018right to be forgotten\\u2019 which is set to formalize, unify and extend the existing Google Spain ruling.\\n\\nBut how to make that happen in practice? How can legal fragmentation be prevented? Relying on his background in conflict of laws, Dr. Michel Reymond shows that finding common standards for the Right to be Forgotten will prove extremely difficult \\u2013 not only regarding its procedural elements, but also when addressing its substance. He also argues that, before even starting a conversation between the U.S. and the E.U., some soul-searching about the nature of the right may need to be performed inside the E.U. itself first.\\n\\nFor more about this event, visit:\\nhttps://cyber.harvard.edu/events/luncheons/2016/05/Reymond'