BROADCASTS.com

b'

[Previously in sequence:\\xa0Epistemic Learned Helplessness,\\xa0Book Review: The Secret Of Our Success,\\xa0List Of Passages I Highlighted In My Copy Of The Secret Of Our Success. Deleted a controversial section which I still think was probably correct, but which given the number of objections wasn\\u2019t provably correct enough to be worth including. I might write another post giving my evidence for it later, but it probably shouldn\\u2019t be dropped in here without justification.]

I.

Years ago, I wrote about\\xa0symmetric vs. asymmetric weapons.

A symmetric weapon is one that works just as well for the bad guys as for the good guys. For example, violence \\u2013 your morality doesn\\u2019t determine how hard you can punch; they can buy guns from the same places we can.

An asymmetric weapon is one that works better for the good guys than the bad guys. The example I gave was Reason. If everyone tries to solve their problems through figuring out what the right thing to do is, the good guys (who are right) will have an easier time proving themselves to be right than the bad guys (who are wrong). Finding and using asymmetric weapons is the only non-coincidence way to make sustained moral progress.

The parts of\\xa0The Secret Of Our Success\\xa0that deal with reason vs. cultural evolution raise a disturbing prospect: what if sometimes, the asymmetry is in the wrong direction? What if there are some issues where rational debate inherently leads you astray?