BROADCASTS.com

b"

Presenter Chris Bowlby asks whether a state welfare system can ever distinguish between those who deserve help and those who do not. \\nAs the recession bites and public spending cuts loom there have been calls, on both sides of the political debate, for a re-moralisation of welfare. Some say that the entitlement culture has gone too far, others that the hard-working poor should not be footing the bill for those who choose not to take a job. When did the language change and what does a change in vocabulary really mean? \\nAnd even if desirable can distinctions between welfare recipients be made in practice? If there are time limits on the receipt of welfare will more people end up better-off in work or worse-off unable to work? \\nAnalysis will look at what history can teach us about making moral distinctions between the poor - both when the economy is booming & when it's contracting. And what of those, such as the children of welfare recipients, caught up in the debate : can it ever right to reduce the money which may give them a better future? \\nContributors : \\nWill Hutton\\nExecutive vice-chair The Work Foundation \\nAuthor Them & Us

Mark Harrison\\nProfessor of Economics, Warwick University

Tim Montgomerie\\nCo-founder Centre for Social Justice\\nEditor, ConservativeHome

Hazel Forsyth\\nsenior curator, Museum of London

Jose Harris\\nEmeritus Professor of Modern History, Oxford University

Alison Park\\nCo-editor British Social Attitudes Survey

Philip Booth \\nEditorial & Programme Director, Institute of Economic Affairs

Gordon Lewis\\nCommunity Project Manager, Salvation Army

Rod Nutten\\nVolunteer, Salvation Army

Wolfie\\nClient, Salvation Army

Major Ivor Telfer \\nAssistant Secretary for Programmes, Salvation Army UK & Republic of Ireland

Presenter : Chris Bowlby \\nProducer : Rosamund Jones.