Two news stories from ABC "FAKE NEWS" These are the ONLY stories the Presstitutes report truthfully. TROLLS are being served through YouTube and Google with a cease & desist order & are subject to civil lawsuit. The national database of sex offenders does have a sort of â??Big Brotherishâ?? undertone, it is not to be used as a means for stalking and/or harassing these individuals. It is supposed to be a system for allowing concerned members of the community to become aware of who is living in their neighborhoods. It is important to keep in mind however, that over 90% of those whose names appear on this list are not sexually violent and deranged predators as depicted on television shows such as CSI and Law and Order SVU. While some (statistically a very small percentage) have committed heinous acts, their is a laundry list of offenses that upon conviction will result in oneâ??s name becoming etched into the pages of the National Sex Offender Registry. While state legislatures are required to make members of the community aware that they will be prosecuted for offenses committed against registrants, currently, at least in the majority of jurisdictions, registrants are granted no greater protection than any non-registrant. This is concerning when one takes into consideration the fact that ANYONE can gain access to personal information of those listed on this registry, most of whom have committed only minor offenses, and some who are victims of vindictive ex-spouses. If your are someone who uses this database, please respect the rights of the men and women listed therein as you would any other member of your community, keeping in mind that the overwhelming majority of these men and women are falsely accused, and the majority of the truly guilty will never re-offend. EXAMPLE STORY WITH CASE LAW All she wanted to do, Delores Ann Harris told a jury Friday, was to protect herself and her granddaughter from a man who had been convicted 21 years ago of aggravated sexual battery, a man who has been on the stateâ??s sex offender registry since 1997. But the convicted sex offender in the courtroom was the victim in the jury trial. And Harris, 61, was the defendant, charged with misusing information from the sex offender registry. It took the jury only 23 minutes to find Harris guilty and even less time to impose a $1,500 fine on her for actions that the prosecution described as a campaign of harassment against Scott Costello, 43. â??The commonwealth realizes that Mr. Costello is not a sympathetic victim,â?? Assistant Commonwealthâ??s Attorney Michael Fleming told the six-member jury during closing arguments. But, Fleming said, the state law is clear: The state sex offender registry, including details about Costello, can be easily viewed on a website but the information displayed must not be used â??for purposes of intimidating or harassingâ?? another person. Violations are categorized as class one misdemeanors (called "Disordely Persons" charges in New Jersey) carrying penalties of up to one year in jail and a maximum penalty of $2,500. Harris represented herself at the trial. In an interview after the jury verdict, she continued to deny she had done anything wrong. â??I was dumb for thinking the judicial system would work,â?? Harris said. However, the system DID work as intended. The jury heard testimony from Costello and Rebecca Griffin about a contentious relationship between them and Harris, who was Griffinâ??s neighbor in an apartment building in Front Royal at the time of the offense. No one disputed that Harris informed the state police that Costello was staying in an apartment with Griffin, his fiancée. At the time, Costello had a different address on the sex offender registry, which would have required him to re-register if he had moved in permanently with Griffin. In his closing argument, Fleming recounted testimony from Master State Trooper Jerry Bosserman, who could not find evidence that Costello had moved in permanently with Griffin. Fleming said Harris persisted in her complaints, but Bosserman couldnâ??t determine that Costelloâ??s visits to Griffinâ??s residence had violated any laws. â??Trooper Bosserman said he felt he was on the verge of harassing Mr. Costello,â?? Fleming said. Harris denied earlier testimony from Griffin that she had yelled out the window at Griffin that Costello was going to prison for 20 years and asking how her sex life would be after he was gone. â??My only concern was the safety of myself and my granddaughter,â?? Harris told the jury. The guilty verdict was costly for Harris. She had been convicted of the same offense in general district court and fined only $50 and sentenced to one year unsupervised probat