BROADCASTS.com

Of course, if people want to be cheated, then who can stop them? In Bhagavad-g\u012bt\u0101 K\u1e5b\u1e63\u1e47a also says, ved\u0101nta-k\u1e5bd \u2026 eva c\u0101ham: \u201cI am the compiler of Ved\u0101nta.\u201d Why do these rascals not consider who compiled Ved\u0101nta? Vy\u0101sadeva is the incarnation of K\u1e5b\u1e63\u1e47a. He compiled Ved\u0101nta. Why do these rascals not consider the original Vedantist, K\u1e5b\u1e63\u1e47a? They approach a M\u0101y\u0101v\u0101d\u012b instead. So how will they understand Ved\u0101nta?\nSuppose I have written a book. If you cannot understand something in it, then you should come directly to me for an explanation. That is sensible. Why go to a rascal who has nothing to do with my book? Similary, some rascal M\u0101y\u0101v\u0101d\u012b may claim, \u201cI am a Vedantist,\u201d but why should I go to a rascal instead of the real compiler of the Ved\u0101nta-s\u016btra?\nThose who approach the M\u0101y\u0101v\u0101d\u012b Vedantists for knowledge are also rascals. They are willingly being cheated. Let the M\u0101y\u0101v\u0101d\u012b Vedantists and their followers accept the conclusions of Bhagavad-g\u012bt\u0101 and \u015ar\u012bmad-Bh\u0101gavatam. Then they will understand Ved\u0101nta-s\u016btra. They\u2019ll be real Vedantists. Otherwise, they will remain cheaters. So if you go to a cheater you\u2019ll be cheated, and that is your business. \u2022\u2022\u2022 if you\u2019d like to find links to read for free or purchase: sravanamdiaries.com/civilization-and-transcendence