BROADCASTS.com

Today marks the end of year 15 on the Software Process and Measurement Cast, and we are closing the year with pitchfork and torches. We discussed the world of knowledge work in 2022. Leadership, principles, value, and values take center stage. Panels like this make me want to do panels every week! The panelists (other than myself) are: Jeremy Berriault Web: \xa0 Jon M Quigley Web: https://www.valuetransform.com/product-development-tools/ Kevin Rush Twitter: @ Chris Hurney Web: Twitter: Participating in spirit (they were on part one last week) Susan Parente Susan Parente\xa0 \xa0Twitter:\xa0@TechRiskManager Jeremy Willets \xa0 Blog: \xa0 \xa0 Re-Read Saturday News\xa0 Week 3 of our re-read of\xa0 tackles s. Chapter 2 begins the heavy lifting of improving conversations. This is a chapter I strongly suggest reading at least twice while you are putting the ideas into practice. The authors spend the first part of the chapter building a case for why conversations are so powerful. The authors state that through conversation \u201cwe are able to create and believe in shared fictions.\u201d There is a ton to think about and practice! My experiment of the week: First an update on my conversation experiment from last week. Last week I wanted to review my conversations to determine if I was correctly assessing scenarios using the Cynefin Framework. There was at least one conversation where I misjudged the complexity.\xa0 Whereas the participants viewed the scenario being discussed to be complicated (the solution being a framework or best practices), I viewed the scenario as complex or possibly chaotic.\xa0 The differences in mental models made the conversation tense and ungratifying. In my mind, my failure was not recognizing the issue until I was reviewing the conversation after the fact (one of the Four Rs in Chapter 2). I think a better approach, for me, will be to assess the complexity of the scenario before the conversion in the future. Perhaps a form of conversational premortem.\xa0 This week I am going to use the conversational analysis process on two or three different types of hard conversations \u2013 my weeks are always interesting. One of the areas I am interested in contemplating is whether different kinds of conversations have different question ratios.\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 Week 1: - \xa0 Week 2: - \xa0 Week 3: - \xa0 \xa0 Next SPaMCAST\xa0 Next week we have an interview with Martin Foster. Mr. Foster and I wrestle with the question, \u201cWhy don\u2019t most agile transformations deliver tangible business value?\u201d\xa0 A valuable start to year 16 and 2022!