Published: Nov. 11, 2016, 5 p.m.
We discuss possible effects that the Trump presidency will have on the tech world. The ideas are more or less known, but the details and whether they'd be enacted are sketchy and unreliable. Before that, of course, we talk about containers.
\n\n
This episode features Brandon Whichard, Matt Ray, and Cot\xe9.
\n\nMid-roll\n\n
\n\nK8s Operators\n\n
\n\nAzure Container Service, now with K8s\n\n
\n\nDocker in Production: A History of Failure\n\n
\n- From this dude\u2019s perspective: a failure of product management and stable releases.
\n- Bugs, documentation spotty, cleanup scripts, kernel support (Debian!?), aufs & overlay & overlay2, 7-hour outage with no post-mortem
\n- \u201cDocker only moves forward and breaks things\u201d
\n- \u201cThe docker hype is not only a technological liability any more, it has evolved into a sociological problem as well.\u201d
\n- A retort\u2026 that mostly agrees
\n- \u201cboring tech is what makes money\u201d shiny tech makes resumes?
\n
\n\nMesosphere\n\n
\n- Jay Lyman on the momemtum: \u201cMesosphere does not disclose its number of paying clients, but says it has dozens of large enterprise customers, its primary target. The company says its experience supporting software deployments in production is among its key differentiators, helped by the use of Apache Mesos by companies such as Twitter, Netflix, Airbnb, PayPal and Yelp, which was featured in a 451 User Deployment Report. Mesosphere says its focus is customer deployments of 500-1,000 nodes per day in production. It also says the bulk of its customers are licensees with professional services accounting for less than 10% of its clients, which tend to move to its subscription software.\u201d
\n
\n\nTrumpTech, aka, \u201cPutting the 400 lbs hackers on diets.\u201d\n\n
\n- Turns out there is some marginally clear policy, just not McKinsey title mode versus white papers.
\n- Jonathan Shieber@Tech Crunch: "The biggest question facing millions of Americans this Wednesday is: just how much of what Donald Trump said on the campaign does he intend to actually try to make happen." (For example, Korea.)
\n- Dave Lee, at the BBC has a good laundry list: \u201cUncertainty, frustration and an increased fragility for the global home of tech innovation. Mr Trump certainly won't want to go down as the president who destroyed Silicon Valley, but the concern here is that of the few policies that have been explained in detail, some seem directly at odds with each other.\u201d
\n- 10% repatriation program - tech companies have tons of cash abroad:
\n- Historic rates: \u201cAt the highest tax rate, corporations must pay 35% to repatriate capital, minus local taxes charged by countries in which the funds are held.\u201d\n\n
\n- Hardware: \u201cAAPL (93% of $230bln), CSCO (91% of $64.6B), IBM ($8.2B total cash, undisclosed % of cash held overseas but note 58% of earnings are from non US operations), HPE ($10.0B total cash, undisclosed % of cash held overseas but 65% of earnings are from non US operations), HPQ ($5.6B total cash, undisclosed % of cash held overseas but 65%-70% of earnings are from non US operations), JNPR (94% of $3.2B).\u201d
\n- Software: \u201cSpecifically, some of the mid and large cap companies that have large cash balances \u201ctrapped\u201d offshore are likely to benefit from being able to return a portion of this cash to shareholders. We note companies with high gross cash balances trapped offshore include: ADBE (85% of $4B \u2013 from 2015 10-K), ADSK (86% of $2.1B), CA (76% of $2.7B), CTXS (80% of $2.45B), FTNT (38% of $1.2B), ORCL (76% of $56B \u2013 pre-N), MSFT (96% of $113B \u2013 pre-LNKD purchase), RHT (42% of $2.0B), SYMC (93% of $5.6B \u2013 post-BC), VMW (77% of $7.5B), VRSN (68% of $1.9B). We believe the chances increase of a larger share repurchase or (lesser chance) dividend from these companies.\u201d
\n
\n- Apple & Amazon are not in a good situation - they\u2019ll be a good test of WTF happens. Meanwhile, tech stocks dropping a bit.
\n- Ovum has a shit ton of quick analysis, all free:\n\n
\n- Fear of US public cloud companies, globally. Remember the freak-out from NSA stuff? Same idea. I think the Gemans got over it.
\n- Outsources:
\n- \u201cA massive curtailing of H-1B visas, for example, will mean providers will need to make immediate shifts in what they\u2019re able to offer customers locally, unless or until they\u2019re able to compensate with talent.\u201d
\n- \u201cFor providers, there\u2019s also the unanswered question of the impact on US government spending.\u201d
\n- [Education](https://www.ovum.com/trumping-expectations-now-us-public-sector-2/ - some proposals for de-centralizing, meaning fragmentation of IT spend.
\n- Government talent, regulations, and spending - \u201cIf there is a large exodus of high-caliber and skilled staff, how will departments fill the gap? It also raises the question of funding for programs aimed at modernizing tech in the federal government such as F18 and FedRAMP. Trump might reduce the barriers to swapping out tech and push down expenditure that way. Certainly, the high cost and length of time needed to get Authority to Operate (ATO) under FedRAMP has been a barrier to uptake.\u201d
\n- Telcos - other than him stating he\u2019d stop the AT&T/TimeWarner merger, telco stuff is very unclear. No one\u2019s sure what the traditional Republican +/- Trump equals, or what the formula is.
\n
\n- M&A from Brenon@451: \u201cChinese buyers probably won't be shopping as freely in the US in the coming years.\u201d They spent $14bn this year, I think.\nChinese buyers have recently picked up Ingram Micro, which swings nearly $50bn worth of tech gear and services each year, 25-year-old printer maker Lexmark and even a majority stake in the gay dating app Grindr." Also see shorter blog post with chart of Chinese M&A spend.
\n- Snowden for Head of NSA!.
\n
\n\nFollow-up\n\n
\n\nBONUS LINKS! Not covered in episode\n\nMatt wrote up an Amazon ECS thing\n\n
\n\nDoing Business in Japan\n\n
\n\nRecommendations\n\n
Sponsored By: