Episode 391: Post-staff and direct or a jerk

Published: Jan. 15, 2024, noon

In this episode, Dave and Jamison answer these questions:

\n\n
    \n
  1. \n

    Hey guys! I\u2019m a young engineer in a specialized area of infrastructure. I\u2019m pretty good at what I do, and I\u2019ve been through some leadership development programs, so I\u2019ve advanced to a \u201cStaff\u201d role quickly, just based on observing the age of my peers.

    \n\n

    Tech titles are completely mysterious to me, so I\u2019m wondering - how much \u201cup\u201d is there from where I am? What\u2019s the top of the IC ladder? Do ICs ever become executives? The idea of being a manager and sitting in 1:1s for hours sounds awful to me, so I\u2019m not excited about that side, but I\u2019ve heard, allegedly, that there is room on the IC side for promotion as well.

    \n\n

    I\u2019m a goal setter, and I kinda feel like I\u2019ve hit a ceiling, so I don\u2019t know where to set my target anymore. I don\u2019t even know that I care about titles that much, but I very much like the pay raises that accompany them.

    \n\n

    Thanks!

    \n
  2. \n
  3. \n

    Johnny Droptbales:

    \n\n

    How do I tell if my manager is a direct communicator or a jerk? Should I trust my gut on this (he\u2019s a jerk)?

    \n\n

    I\u2019ve been working with my manager for a year now. He\u2019s fairly fluent in English, educated, and keeps up with broad knowledge of our team/domain. He often connects different aspects of our work to discover discrepancies, bugs, and interesting ideas.

    \n\n

    I\u2019m trying to wrap my head around his communication style. Here are a few examples that stand out:

    \n\n
      \n
    1. I refused to take on a new small project because I was concerned about meeting the deadline on my high-priority solo project. He gave me feedback that I missed an opportunity to demonstrate context-switching skills, which would look good for a promotion. I responded with my own reasoning, but he wasn\u2019t interested and just moved on to the next topic.
    2. \n
    3. He insisted on a new weekly requirement for our on-call pager rotation, which is to come up with one idea to improve the experience. When I asked why asking for help on a problem wouldn\u2019t be enough, he answered that he expected his engineers to have been hired for their critical thinking and leadership skills, and they should be able to demonstrate those.
    4. \n
    5. Recently he\u2019s been leading weekly meetings to improve the on-call experience. He tends to ask very direct questions \u2013 we\u2019ll look at a bug ticket, and he asks, \u201cWhat is the root cause?\u201d \u201cWhy do we do this?\u201d \u201cWhat are your ideas to solve this?\u201d When pressed, he insisted this was a brainstorming sort of conversation, as opposed to a Q&A.
    6. \n
    \n
  4. \n