New and improved ! Essential geoengineering news and chat in less time but still with all the reviewer2 charm.

Published: Nov. 29, 2020, 10:17 p.m.

Thank you for your comments. We have shortened and edited the episode. It is packed with news and commentary, some of the articles are below, not all fit under the word count for the podcast description. Please continue with the feedback. 

\n


\n

Possible climate transitions from breakup of stratocumulus decks under greenhouse warming Nature Geoscience volume 12, pages163\u2013167(2019) https://t.co/L9riE6fgEE?amp=1

\n

 @JesseLReynolds Is solar geoengineering ungovernable? A critical assessment of governance challenges identified by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

\n

First published: 11 November 2020 https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.690

\n

 David Keith tweet

\n

Cool new paper from Tapio Schneider. If SRM interacts with convection in unexpected ways then agreement in GeoMIP models just encourages overconfidence

\n

Solar geoengineering may not prevent strong warming from direct effects of CO2 on stratocumulus cloud cover. PNAS first published November 16, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2003730117

\n

 @CEMEX and Synhelion talked with @GlobalCement

\n

Magazine about how they want to replace fossil fuels with #solar heat in cement plants. 

\n

Read pages 26-28: https://globalcement.com/magazine/back-issues/dec-2020

\n

https://solarpaces.org/cemex-and-synhelion-to-demo-zero-co2-cement/\u2026 

\n

 SRMGI/DECIMALS, which supports solar geo research in developing countries. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/abbf13\u2026

\n

 JensFriis Lund tweet

\n

I'm in good scholarly company here criticizing Shell's offsetting scheme \u201cWorse than doing nothing\u201d: Shell\u2019s REDD offsets in Indonesia and Peru https://redd-monitor.org/2020/11/19/worse-than-doing-nothing-shells-redd-offsets-in-indonesia-and-peru/

\n

 "Right now the entities best poised to do this are fossil fuel companies,\u201d @hollyjeanbuck says, "Do we allow them to reconfigure themselves as carbon removal companies \u2013 or would that evade reparative and corrective justice?\u201d https://vice.com/en/article/akdvy4/carbon-capture-storage-oil-companies-profit\u2026 via @vice

\n

Oil Companies Want to Get Even Richer Sucking Their Own Emissions Out of the Air

\n

Mark Carney oversees blueprint for scaling up carbon market as offset demand soars https://www.climatechangenews.com/2020/11/10/mark-carney-oversees-blueprint-scaling-carbon-market-offset-demand-soars/

\n

https://conserwater.com Using our AIs, we are launching the world's first international soil carbon market where corporations, governments and individuals can pay to offset their carbon dioxide emissions, and farmers can get paid to increase their soil carbon levels. Sign up today to fight climate change! 

\n

 

\n

INEA tweet (Innovation and networks executive agency EU)

\n

Read all about the groundbreaking 

\n

@CarbFix agreements against #climatechange with @Climeworks

\n

& #ONpower to significantly scale-up carbon removal & storage in #Iceland. Article

\n

 https://europa.eu/!CF74DQ Project https://europa.eu/!bR47nP

\n

 D'Maris Coffman tweet/Andrew Lockley paper 

\n

State commissioning of Solar Radiation Management geoengineering https://tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21550085.2020.1848176#.X7u4G-bp2qM.twitter\u2026 

\n

Published: 06 October 2020

\n

Assessing Carbon Capture: Public Policy, Science, and Societal Need. A Review of the Literature on Industrial Carbon Removal June Sekera & Andreas Lichtenberger Biophysical Economics and Sustainability volume 5, Article number: 14 (2020) Cite this article

\n