Does the carbon removal tech you\u2019re developing have a shot at being cost-competitive in the real world? How might you reduce the cost of a given CDR technology? And how do you convince government funders or investors that your carbon removal idea is viable?
\nA techno-economic assessment or TEA answers these questions.
\nSo, what is involved in conducting a techno-economic assessment? And how might it help a startup improve the economic performance of its climate tech and maximize its impact?
\nGrant Faber is Founder and President of Carbon-Based Consulting, a firm that offers techno-economic assessments, early-stage emissions accounting, and market research for startups, investors, and environmental nonprofits in the CDR and CCUS space.
\nOn this bonus episode of Reversing Climate Change, Grant joins Ross, Siobhan, and Asa to explain why an understanding of economics is crucial in carbon removal and how a TEA helps us determine the cost per tonne of carbon removal.
\nGrant walks us through the concept of learning rates, discussing why different technologies have different learning rates, and how founders might apply these principles to reduce costs.
\nListen in for insight on the potentially arbitrary nature of life cycle assessments and learn how Grant can help your organization accelerate the commercialization of carbon removal technology.
\nConnect with Nori
\n\n\n\nCheck out our other podcast, Carbon Removal Newsroom
\nCarbon Removal Memes on Twitter
\nCarbon Removal Memes on Instagram
\nResources
\n\n\n\n\nGlobal CO2 Initiative TEA Guidelines
\n\n\n\n\u2018Factors Affecting the Cost of Airplanes\u2019 in the Journal of Aeronautical Sciences
\n\u2018Evaluating the Causes of Cost Reduction in Photovoltaic Modules\u2019 in Energy Policy
\n\n\n\n--- \n\nSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/reversingclimatechange/support