Regardless of where you stand on the ethics of eating meat, the fact is, it\u2019s a big part of the climate math. It provokes strong feelings all around, some of which may be contradictory within one\u2019s self. And so much of the climate analysis is dependent upon how the animals were raised, marketed, and so on. It\u2019s hard to speak (at least for some) with crisp lines. In this episode we wade into these details.
\nJonathan Safran Foer is the bestselling author of Eating Animals, Everything Is Illuminated, Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, and We Are the Weather: Saving the Planet Begins at Breakfast. Today, Jonathan joins Ross to describe his relationship with meat, explaining what inspired him to become a vegetarian at the age of nine and why he is willing to admit to moral failure when he grabs a burger at the airport.
\nJonathan shares his proposal for reducing our meat consumption as posited in We Are the Weather, weighing in on why it\u2019s dangerous to make our food choices such a big part of our identity. Listen in for Jonathan\u2019s insight on what makes climate change such a difficult story to tell and learn why Jonathan thinks reserving meat for dinner is a productive form of climate activism.
\nResources:
\nWe Are the Weather: Saving the Planet Begins at Breakfast by Jonathan Safran Foer
\nThe Omnivore\u2019s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals by Michael Pollan
\n\u2018Options for Keeping the Food System Within Environmental Limits\u2019 in Nature
\n\n\nKate Knibbs on Reversing Climate Change S2EP12
\nThe Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming by David Wallace-Wells
\nLearning to Die in the Anthropocene by Roy Scranton
\n\n\n\n\n\nEmail podcast@nori.com
\n\n\n--- \n\nSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/reversingclimatechange/support