BROADCASTS.com

Note: Our guest on this week\u2019s show signed his responses so we are also making a video of this podcast available here: youtube.com/watch?v=zgbTsGnQOdQ&t=2651s Donations from the 40,000 attendees at this year\u2019s Passion Conference raised nearly half a million dollars to fund Bible translations for the deaf. These funds will boost projects in Mexico, Cuba, Colombia, Moldova, Egypt, Ghana, South Africa, Tanzania, Ethiopia, South Sudan, Myanmar, Thailand, Malaysia, the Philippines, Japan, and Russia. No sign language has a full Bible translation, and just 2 percent of deaf people around the world have access to the Gospels in their sign languages. According to CT\u2019s reporting: Sign languages aren\u2019t structured like text-based or spoken languages [and] they require their own processes for passages of Scripture to be told visually through sign. Chronological Bible Translation (CBT) translates the Bible by stories, while Book-by-Book (BBB) translation uses the chapter and verse structure, the Deaf Bible Society explained. The deaf community is made up of visual learners, says Jason Suhr, the director of Scripture Engagement & Translation at the Deaf Bible Society. \u201cWe don\u2019t rely on specific words,\u201d said Suhr, through translator William Ross III. \u201cWe kind of rely more on images and the context of those images.\u201d When someone is signing, they will first set the scene, often spelling out the weather and where objects, plants, trees, or people might be. \u201cYou don\u2019t really get a lot of that in English,\u201d said Suhr. \u201cYou have to create that image in your head, whereas deaf people are able to set that up.\u201d Suhr joined digital media producer Morgan Lee and editor in chief Mark Galli to to explore why it\u2019s taken such a long time to provide this community with a translation of the Bible and what it will take to transform this situation.\nLearn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices