BROADCASTS.com

Today, Hunter sat down with Marea Beeman, Director of Research Initiatives for Defender Legal Services at the National Legal Aid and Defender Association (NLADA), to discuss their recent report, \u201cAt What Cost? Findings from an Examination into the Imposition of Public Defense System Fees.

\xa0

If you ask the average person what the word \u201cfree\u201d means, they will likely tell you it means whatever is considered \u201cfree\u201d does not have any cost associated with it. So, when people hear, \u201cIf you cannot afford counsel, one will be appointed to you at no cost to yourself\u201d, people would likely assume that this attorney is \u201cfree\u201d. Anyone who is familiar with our legal system, however, will inform you that you will likely have to pay for your Public Defender. In fact, in many states, the first time you appear before a judge, that judge will make clear to you that your counsel will cost you.

\xa0

From a top-down look at all 50 states, to deep dives into the Public Defender fees in Oklahoma, Iowa, and New Hampshire, Marea and Hunter discuss the various ways these fees trap people in never ending cycles of debt that can lead to future incarceration, loss of driving privileges, and work to perpetuate a broken, predatory legal system

\xa0

Guests:

\xa0

Marea Beeman, Director of Research Initiatives for Defender Legal Services at the National Legal Aid and Defender Association (NLADA),

\xa0

Key Topics and Takeaways:

How Marea got into this work [8:00]

\xa0

What is the NLADA [9:30]

\xa0

What do you mean my \u201cfree attorney\u201d isn\u2019t free [10:30]

\xa0

Difference Between Fines and Fees [14:20]

\xa0

Methodology of the Study [17:50]

\xa0

The Issues with Indigency Determination [21:00]

\xa0

Findings from Oklahoma [26:13]

\xa0

Findings in Iowa [39:40]

\xa0

Findings in New Hampshire [53:00]

\xa0

Solutions to the Issue [57:00]

\xa0

\xa0

Resources:

NLADA Report

\xa0

NY Times Report on Alabama Fees and Fines

\xa0

Alabama Appleseed Report

\xa0

Fuller v Oregon (SCOTUS found there is a legitimate interest in states recovering the cost of representation)

\xa0

Bearden v Georgia

\xa0

\xa0

\xa0

Follow NLADA on Twitter

\xa0

\xa0

Contact Hunter Parnell:

\xa0

\xa0

hwparnell@publicdefenseless.com

\xa0

Instagram

\xa0

Twitter

\xa0

www.publicdefenseless.com

\xa0