BROADCASTS.com

Like most people, shows like CSI, Law and Order, or even Dexter, may have you convinced that the science used to convict people is airtight. Everything from bite marks, blood spatter, and even finger prints, must be scientifically valid...right?\xa0

\xa0

What if I told you, almost all of it is predicated on junk science and the failings of the legal system to catch it? Today\u2019s guest is on the show to highlight this and the infrastructure that has been created to support wrongful convictions.\xa0

\xa0

Chris Fabricant is the Director of Strategic Litigation at the Innocence Project and the author of Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System.

\xa0

In this episode, we will go over some of the findings in Chris' book that help us to understand how the legal system allowed bad science to become such a powerful tool to wrongfully convict thousands of Americans.

\xa0

Giving his solutions to the junk science problem, Chris will leave you with the hope that it will one day be no more.\xa0

\xa0

Key Topics and Takeaways:

\xa0

• Hunter\u2019s definition of a wrongful conviction. [6:25]
• How junk science got into the criminal system. [13:37]
• The issue with pattern matching. [23:09]
• Society\u2019s strong desire to punish. [31:12]
• How the Supreme Court has played a role in wrongful convictions and mass incarceration. [37:06]
• The principle of finality. [38:03]
• Denialism around actual innocence. [47:17]
• Promoting scientific literacy among lawyers. [1:06:25]

\xa0

Guest:

\xa0

Chris Fabricant, Director of Strategic Litigation, Innocence Project

\xa0

Resources:

\xa0

2009 National Academy of Sciences Report\xa0

2016 PCAST Forensic Science Report\xa0

Buy Chris\u2019s Book Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System\xa0

\xa0

Memorable Quotes:

\xa0

\u201cI don't think people actually want to live in the type of society that our legal principles say we should be living in.\u201d (4:50, Hunter)

\xa0

\u201cWhat we know about the law as compared to science is that the law is stable.\u201d (22:17, Chris)

\xa0

\u201cIn reality, crime usually happens. Police get together, form their suspect. And then, a lot of the analysis of the evidence is then with that suspect in mind.\u201d (27:39, Hunter)

\xa0

\u201cScience should always be objective, it should be separated from the adversarial process.\u201d (29:40, Chris)

\xa0

\u201cThere\u2019s widespread scientific illiteracy in the bar.\u201d [50:59, Chris)

\xa0

\u201cOnce you're accused unless you can afford really, really good counsel, you're kind of fucked.\u201d (59:56, Hunter)

\xa0

Contact Hunter Parnell:

hwparnell@publicdefenseless.com

Instagram

Twitter

www.publicdefenseless.com