BROADCASTS.com

Jau vair\u0101kus gadus homoseksu\u0101li p\u0101ri Latvij\u0101 var tikt atz\u012bti par \u0123imeni, sa\u0146emot tiesas spriedumus, kuros konstat\u0113ta "publiski tiesisko attiec\u012bbu past\u0101v\u0113\u0161ana" jeb, vienk\u0101r\u0161iem v\u0101rdiem sakot \u2013 atz\u012bts, ka starp p\u0101ri past\u0101v \u0123imenes attiec\u012bbas Satversmes 110. panta izpratn\u0113.\n\nT\u0101pat ar\u012b r\u012bt Saeimas s\u0113d\u0113 gal\u012bgaj\u0101 las\u012bjum\u0101 skat\u012bs Tieslietu ministrijas pied\u0101v\u0101to partner\u012bbas regul\u0113jumu, kas b\u016bs jauns veids, k\u0101 juridiski nostiprin\u0101t divu pilngad\u012bgu personu, tostarp viendzimuma p\u0101ru, attiec\u012bbas un paredz\u0113t t\u0101m noteiktu aizsardz\u012bbu.\n\nBet k\u0101 ir realit\u0101t\u0113?\n\nK\u0101 nor\u0101da gan LGBT kom\u016bnas p\u0101rst\u0101vji, gan advok\u0101ti \u2013 ne ar tiesas spriedumu, ne jauno pied\u0101v\u0101to partnerattiec\u012bbu regul\u0113jumu, viendzimuma p\u0101ru \u0123ime\u0146u b\u016btisk\u0101k\u0101s probl\u0113mas netiek risin\u0101tas un tiesved\u012bbas procesi, kur viendzimuma p\u0101ri c\u012bn\u0101s par sav\u0101m ties\u012bb\u0101m, k\u0101 bija t\u0101 b\u016bs.