BROADCASTS.com

b'Novadu reforma v\\u0113l nav nosl\\u0113gusies Varak\\u013c\\u0101nos, Garkaln\\u0113, kur par robe\\u017e\\u0101m dr\\u012bz lems Saeima. Garkalnes pagasta sadal\\u012b\\u0161ana c\\u0113lusi gaism\\u0101 domstarp\\u012bbas par k\\u0101rt\\u012bbu, k\\u0101 \\u0161\\u0101di jaut\\u0101jumi b\\u016btu j\\u0101lemj, jo skaidri krit\\u0113riji likum\\u0101 nav noteikti. Vienlaikus tie rais\\u012bju\\u0161i diskusiju par to, cik liel\\u0101 m\\u0113r\\u0101 jaut\\u0101jumos par novadu robe\\u017e\\u0101m teik\\u0161anai j\\u0101b\\u016bt pa\\u0161iem iedz\\u012bvot\\u0101jiem. Vai vajadz\\u0113tu ar\\u012b iedz\\u012bvot\\u0101jiem referendum\\u0101 \\u013caut izlemt, kur\\u0101 novad\\u0101 vi\\u0146i v\\u0113l\\u0113tos dz\\u012bvot, analiz\\u0113jam Krustpunkt\\u0101. Diskut\\u0113 Vides aizsardz\\u012bbas un re\\u0123ion\\u0101l\\u0101s att\\u012bst\\u012bbas ministrijas parlament\\u0101r\\u0101 sekret\\u0101re Ilze Damb\\u012bte-Damberga, Saeimas Valsts p\\u0101rvaldes un pa\\u0161vald\\u012bbas komisijas vad\\u012bt\\u0101js O\\u013cegs Burovs un \\u0161\\u012bs pa\\u0161as komisijas deput\\u0101ts M\\u0101ris Sprind\\u017euks, vi\\u0146\\u0161 ar\\u012b bijis VARAM vad\\u012bt\\u0101js un \\u0100da\\u017eu novada m\\u0113rs.\\n\\n\\n\\nGarkalnes st\\u0101sts \\u012bsum\\u0101 ir t\\u0101ds: likum\\u0101, kas vis\\u0101 valst\\u012b main\\u012bja administrat\\u012bv\\u0101s robe\\u017eas, tika noteikts, ka l\\u012bdz pag\\u0101ju\\u0161\\u0101 gada beig\\u0101m \\u0100da\\u017eiem un Ropa\\u017eiem ir j\\u0101izlemj par Garkalnes pieder\\u012bbu, j\\u0101pie\\u0146em l\\u0113mumi, jo Garkalne tika pievienota Ropa\\u017eu novadam. Ropa\\u017eos veica iedz\\u012bvot\\u0101ju aptauju, kur\\u0101 nol\\u0113ma, ka Baltezera ciems un apkaime un M\\u0101rsili b\\u016bs \\u0100da\\u017eu novad\\u0101, p\\u0101r\\u0113jais - Ropa\\u017eu novad\\u0101.\\n\\nCilv\\u0113ki ir izteiku\\u0161i neapmierin\\u0101t\\u012bbu, nor\\u0101dot, ka aptaujas nav biju\\u0161as ar piln\\u012bgi skaidriem nosac\\u012bjumiem. Ir cilv\\u0113ki, kuri uzskata, ka vair\\u0101k Garkalnes vajadz\\u0113ja non\\u0101kt \\u0100da\\u017eu novad\\u0101. Katr\\u0101 zi\\u0146\\u0101 Ropa\\u017ei l\\u0113mumu ir pie\\u0146\\u0113mu\\u0161i, bet \\u0100da\\u017ei gaida \\u0161os nosac\\u012bjumus un skaidr\\u012bbu, kurai j\\u0101b\\u016bt l\\u012bdz n\\u0101kamaj\\u0101m pa\\u0161vald\\u012bbu v\\u0113l\\u0113\\u0161an\\u0101m, kas b\\u016bs jau 2025. gad\\u0101.\\n\\nGalu gal\\u0101 kad l\\u0113mums par Garkalnes pieder\\u012bbu tiks pie\\u0146emts un kur\\u0161 to izdar\\u012bs? Un vai ir iesp\\u0113jams, ka Garkalne paliek viens veselums pie vienas vai otras pa\\u0161vald\\u012bbas?'