BROADCASTS.com

Without question, 2023 has been a banner year in the decades-long endeavor to bring disclosure about the reality of the so-called UFO Phenomenon to public awareness. Ever since the mid 20th century there has been a dedicated push by a relatively small but growing contingent of die-hards to finally get the U.S. government to admit what it knows about these beings from \u201celsewhere\u201d; beings who have apparently been at work in our civilization in very substantive albeit clandestine ways. Based on the political machinations that began churning soon after the dawn of the startling allegations brought forward by a former insider named David Grusch, that push seemed to finally be paying dividends.

That said, of late the startling progress seen earlier in the summer seems to have slowed. So much so, in fact, that some have begun to wonder aloud, with chagrin, if perhaps the historic secrecy/disinformation machine \u2013 which has been pushing back in its own dedicated way ever since these revelations came to light \u2013 might once again be about to turn this apparently irreversible progress into yet another mirage.

While on the one hand, such a feat seems more like wizardry \u2013 after all, how could these revelations not at the very least lead to a deep and broad congressional investigation? \u2013 it does indeed seem as if our society is carrying on with the same old, same old, in regards to what tends to garner public attention. Now that we\u2019re just over a year away from a hotly contested federal election, perhaps not surprisingly the vast majority of public and media focus has turned to that epic showdown; one being seeded by near civil-war like stratifications within the national fabric.

The question now arising is this: can this push for disclosure hope to gain enough steam, and make enough noise, to be heard amongst this rising national clamor leading up to an historic moment in late 2024? At least, that\u2019s the question some are asking; chiefly those concerned this might all come down to a monumental run of bad luck around timing.

From another point of view, however \u2013 one that I personally think is more robustly informed by the full scope of the matters in play here \u2013 these issues are not separable; and certainly not coincidental. I would argue that the what, when, and how of these matters again comes down \u2013 at least in part \u2013 to the clandestine actions of those mysterious actors; ones who seem to be both everywhere and\xa0everywhen, except for when you expressly go looking for them.

Is this seeming overarching orchestration humbling to our collective sense of agency, and even to our species\u2019 perspective on planetary sovereignty? Certainly. Does it suggest that disclosure \u2013 however one defines that term \u2013 simply isn\u2019t something that humanity alone can muster up enough momentum to bring to bear \u2013 at least, not at our current stage of development? Yes, without question. I think history makes this matter crystal clear.

Questions we should be asking include the following: What do they want in the midst of all of this? What is their overarching agenda? Is it singular or plural? Are\xa0they\xa0singular or plural? If they\u2019ve shaped our history \u2013 to one degree or another \u2013 what do they intend for our future? And what role are they playing as the figures on the chessboard seemingly move about of their own volition? Considering the subject of disclosure from this much more panoptic vantage point is exactly the approach we will be taking in this particular discussion, as we aim to make sense of these intriguing yet imposing matters, in this, the 89th episode of the Point of Convergence podcast.