It has been said that conflicting expert testimony merely \u201ccancels\u201d each expert out: that experts can lose, but not win, a case. Are these mantras valid? What are the secrets to effective expert testimony? What mixture of \u201chonest broker\u201d and \u201cadvocacy\u201d is the right one? Is the expert a \u201cnarrator\u201d of facts or a hammer for ultimate issues?
SESSION CHAIR / MODERATOR
Ian SIMMONS / O\u2019Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, DC
SPEAKERS