There seem to be fewer and fewer opportunities to build relationships between adversarial governments in the Middle East region. Even the faint promise that briefly flared during the negotiations over Iran\u2019s nuclear program has faded. Today, the Middle East has fewer communications channels and institutional forums than any other region in the world.\nDalia Dassa Kaye and David Griffiths debate some of the incremental possibilities to begin constructing (or reconstructing) the region\u2019s security architecture. If expectations are kept low and governments are willing to improvise, these researchers suggest there are prospects to establish rudimentary security architecture. \nGriffiths argues that sailors can find common ground on technical matters like incidents at sea and search and rescue, which can provide the basis of some security cooperation. Dassa Kaye suggests that new initiatives can come out of difficult period like the present. Can technical agreements over sea lanes, nuclear waste, or disputed boundaries ever translate into the type of political process necessary to effectively manage conflict, or resolve it?\nRead Dalia Dassa Kaye\u2019s \u201cCan It Happen Here? Prospects for Regional Security Cooperation in the Middle East,\u201d David N. Griffiths\u2019 \u201cOceans of Opportunity: Maritime Dimensions of Security in the Arab World,\u201d and Thanassis Cambanis\u2019 \u201cThe Israel-Hezbollah Channel: UNIFIL\u2019s Effective but Limited Conflict-Management Mechanism.\u201d These reports are part of the TCF project \u201cOrder from Ashes: New Foundations for Security in the Middle East.\u201d\nParticipants include:\nDalia Dassa Kaye, director, Center for Middle East Public Policy, the RAND Corporation\nDavid N. Griffiths, independent researcher and former Canadian naval officer\nThanassis Cambanis, senior fellow, The Century Foundation