Host Sloan Simmons joins Lozano Smith partner Arne Sandberg to discuss modular buildings for California school districts, including the basics about modular buildings, procurement alternatives, and new legal developments impacting this area of school construction.
\n
\nShow Notes & References
\n
\n \t1:24 \u2013 Modular buildings
\n \t2:05 \u2013 Modular component buildings vs. modular portables
\n \t4:55 \u2013 Issue of permanent vs. temporary
\n \t6:10 \u2013 Modular component building examples
\n \t7:15 \u2013 Popularity and cost-efficiency
\n \t8:16 \u2013 Building plans (standard or unique designs)
\n \t9:10 \u2013 Competitive bidding and modular buildings
\n \t10:33 \u2013 Delivery methods (competitive bidding, lease-leaseback, design-build)
\n \t13:30 \u2013 Architect involvement
\n \t14:31 \u2013 Lease-leaseback method
\n \t15:16 \u2013 Davis v. Fresno Unified School Dist. (2015) 237 Cal.App.4th 261
\n \t18:16 \u2013 Lease-leaseback scoring and rating system
\n \t19:29 \u2013 Design-build vs. lease-leaseback
\n \t21:03 \u2013 Piggybacking
\n \t22:10 \u2013 Division of the State Architect (DSA)
\n \t22:13 \u2013 Office of Public School Construction (OPSC)
\n \t22:54 \u2013 Public Construction Code section 20118
\n \t24:52 \u2013 Vendor involvement in piggybacking
\n \t26:30 \u2013 Modulars and personal property
\n \t26:43 \u2013 Attorney General opinion: 89 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 1 (#05-405, January 24, 2006)
\n \t28:50 \u2013 Report of the Executive Officer, State Allocation Board Meeting, December 8, 2004
\n \t30:55 \u2013 OPSC e-mail to school districts and county offices of education (July 2021)
\n \t31:55 \u2013 Coalition for Adequate School Housing (CASH)
\n \t33:48 \u2013 Permanent vs. temporary foundations for modular portables
\n \t40:25 \u2013 Critical takeaways
\n
\n\xa0
\n
\nLozano Smith's COVID-19 Resources can be found here.
\n
\nFor more information on the topics discussed in this podcast, please visit our website at: www.lozanosmith.com/podcast.