BROADCASTS.com

Technological innovation cannot take the environmental destruction out of economic growth. Get the real facts, not the blind faith and hope, about whether \u201cdecoupling\u201d can allow more and more \u201cprosperity\u201d for more and more people without also delivering more and more ecosystem collapse.

Decoupling is Not a Thing
In this episode, Dave and Erika take serious exception to Andrew McAfee\u2019s misguided thesis in his latest book, More from Less: The Surprising Story of How We Learned to Prosper Using Fewer Resources\u2014and What Happens Next. Erika really likes Sam Harris\u2019 podcast, Making Sense, but when it comes to his episode interviewing McAfee, Dave assures her it is utter nonsense.

But first\u2026

Individual Action vs. Waiting for System Change
Do individual actions really matter in the face of the climate crisis? Or are they a distraction from critically needed system change? Should we all be flying less, reducing our meat consumption, and/or having fewer children? Or do we wait until government regulations incentivize us to behave better? Erika and Dave agree with Greta Thunberg, but add a few more reasons to do the right thing, and do it now.

They review a piece by BBC Chief Environment Consultant Justin Rowlatt that includes a conversation with Greta Thunberg, plus insights from Princeton University Professor Peter Singer (\u201cthe world's most influential living philosopher\u201d) and Professor Kelly Fielding of the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia. These experts agree that our actions do matter, and we have an opportunity to be the change we want to see. Following Greta\u2019s lead, we can and should signal to others with our actions, if we want to inspire the next environmental movement. Spoiler alert: Free will is real!

Next\u2026

Can the Next President Get Us to Net-Zero Carbon Emissions?
Presidential candidates are promising to deliver the high levels of greenhouse gas emissions targeted by the IPCC. Politicians\u2019 climate policy platforms have been characterized as an \u201cauction of promises,\u201d by analysts. Are these promises realistic? Don\u2019t get your hopes up. What will it really take to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050?\xa0 Would you believe we have to turn on 1500 new wind turbines every day, if we\u2019re not going to give up our overconsuming ways and our quest for eternal economic growth? Good luck with that! Erika and Dave discuss some interesting analysis by Roger Pielke in Forbes.

How to Be Sustainable
Last, but certainly not least, we have a quick chat with a hero at California State University Northridge. Lecturer Dev Vrat teaches classes in sustainability, and caught our attention with an excellent list of\u2026wait for it\u2026individual actions you can take to behave more sustainably. The list was created by his students and published in the student newspaper. We were particularly impressed that the list includes choosing to adopt rather than bring new children into the world.

\xa0

LINKS:

Climate Change Action: We Can't All be Greta, But Your Choices Have a Ripple Effect \u2013 BBC piece by Justin Rowlatt

The Great Uncoupling- A Conversation with Andrew McAfee \u2013 Making Sense podcast

How We Learned to Prosper Using Fewer Resources: The Very Nature of Technological Progress is Being Radically Transformed \u2013 book review

Decoupling is Dead! Long Live Degrowth! \u2013 Resilience.org piece we recommend reading

Study: Decoupling Debunked

Net-Zero Carbon Dioxide Emissions By 2050 Requires a New Nuclear Power Plant Every Day \u2013 by Roger Pielke

How to be Sustainable \u2013 guide by CSUN Students

14 Mayors Commit to Slashing Meat Consumption in Major Cities Worldwide

Planet of the Humans \u2013 new film

Free Will Is Real \u2013 some recommended reading

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Support this Vital Work

Subscribe (free) so you don't miss an episode: