What does it mean to 'live beta'? It means to prefer a life of instability and radical newness, even though it may be 'worse' and 'instable'.
\n\nThe reason why this is such a radical notion:
\n\n\n\n\nIn modern day times, we all seek 'stability' for ourselves, our 'families', etc.
\n
Much of buying a home-- the notion of building 'stability' for your 'growing family'.
\n\nBut ... what if IN-STABILITY were in fact the superior route? That in order to extract the maximum out of life and existence that you MUST seek MAXIMAL instability and dynamism in your life? What would this mean?
\n\nAlso the fun idea--
\n\n\n\n\nBeta lifestyle\n\nThen, your art is never final or perfect. Rather, the ongoing 'beta testing' of your artwork is in fact the goal.
\n
Also as a life thing:
\n\n\n\n\nSeek the life of maximal change and instability.
\n
A 'digital nomad' lifestyle. Or a semi-nomadic one. A life full of travel, unexpectedness, foreign-ness, and learning new things, languages, peoples, cultures, etc.
\n\nDon't seek final or the best\n\nBeta is often inferior to the more 'stable' release, or the public release. Yet, Beta is sexier, more interesting, more bleeding-edge. This is what we love as technologists. To always be on the bleeding-edge of things.
\n\nAlso if we think about this as a lifestyle approach, it is fun:
\n\n\n\n\nEvery day is a new fun exciting chance and opportunity for you to test out something new!
\n
A new approach, a new thought, a new concept, etc/
\n\nNo boundaries or barriers\n\nOne thing I also like about the beta mindset is this: there is no right or wrong, everything is just testing.
\n\nFor example, when I observe Seneca engage with the world, he is just beta testing physics. He sees certain things and objects and interacts with it, and what he is trying to discover is how it reacts as response to him. There\u2019s no right or wrong here; he is simply testing physics, action and reaction, Action and effect.
\n\nAnti-finality\n\nThe problem with a lot of philosophers and thinkers is this: they seek a supreme final, immutable answer to everything. Even Stephen Hawking and his pursuit for \u201ca theory of everything.\u201d
\n\nHowever, seeking an ultimate system, or being a systematizer is bad. Even our best friend Friedrich Nietzsche said \u201cI distrust all systemizers.\u201d Even one of his unfinished books, \u201cThe Will to Power\u201d, he ultimately scrapped it at the end because he realized he was making an ultimate system.
\n\nWhy everyone loves waiting for the new iPhone\n\nIn some ways, Apple and technology is the ultimate optimistic system; there will always be something new and fresh. Even a funny thought:
\n\n\n\n\nOne of the best reasons to keep living, is to simply be able to be alive and witness new innovations given birth.
\n
Also, one of the great reasons to be a photographer is that we are the ultimate synthesis and hybrid of technology and art. Consider, the camera is one of the most technological apparatus for creating art. And yes, us as photographers are artists.
\n\nTherefore, as time goes on, new innovations will continue to be given birth which will make our lives as photographers happier, more productive, more creative, more artistic, more efficient, and lighter.
\n\nEven the other day when I was shooting some street photography at the mall here in Phnom Penh, I was thinking to myself; \u201cWow, I wish I had a Ricoh GR 3 or Ricoh GR