I once heard a teacher tell his students, "If you want to be able to break the rules, you have to know them first." Basically, the point is something similar to Chesterton's fence. Rather than breaking the rules when you don't understand them, you should only remove barriers with a good cause. In Meditations on First Philosophy, Rene Descartes flips the rules of philosophy on their head in this experiment.
\n"If you would be a real seeker after truth, it is necessary that at least once in your life you doubt, as far as possible, all things."
\n\nKnow the Rules
\nPhilosophy operates on certain rules and conditions, and it takes a lot to learn them. While I'm no expert, I do think that I know what I don't know. I enjoy philosophy and walking through arguments, but I don't have all the terms and processes down. But, I do see why the rules are in place. They keep the conversation on track and help people know how to "play the game." If two people want to spar or square off, the rules must be established and agreed upon. The framework philosophers have created over the last couple thousand years help us do that in a much more productive way.
\nCheck out the full Library here >>
\nDifferent Ways of Breaking the Rules
\nNow that we know why we have the rules, I want to discuss the ways we break them. Rules can be broken out of ignorance, anger, spite, or for a good cause. So, it's important to know which reason you have to break a rule when you do it.
\nHere are some different ways people go about it:
\nWatch or listen and find more content here --> Breaking the Rules of Philosophy show notes
\n\n--- \n\nSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/conofourgen/support