BROADCASTS.com

We make claims about Bitcoin's assurances all the time. \xa0It is censorship resistant, it's open and permissionless, it's counterfeit proof, etc. \xa0But are these things entirely true? When someone wants to acquire, use, or validate Bitcoin, how well do the claims match reality?\n\nToday we cover another great article from @nic_carter titled: "Unpacking Bitcoin's Assurances." \xa0Don't forget to follow Nic on Twitter and Medium, and drop some applause on the original article at the link below:\nhttps://medium.com/@nic__carter/unpacking-bitcoins-assurances-a3c98824d3f0\n\nMentioned again because it always seems to come up in discussion, the great piece by @hasufl and @zhusu about Bitcoin as an independent system for property rights:\nhttps://anchor.fm/thecryptoconomy/episodes/CryptoQuikRead_225---Bitcoin--the-Promise-of-Independent-Property-Rights-e3j6b8\n\nIf you love the show and would like to support and get access to the exclusive Cryptoconomy telegram group, become a patron below!\nhttps://www.patreon.com/thecryptoconomy\n\n--- \n\nSend in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/bitcoinaudible/message