BROADCASTS.com

Apologetics Live 11/08/2018\nWomen in ministry was the opening topic:\xa0 Some very helpful references to learn more about Women in Ministry is on the CARM website:\xa0http://carm.org/women-in-ministry\nThe chat moved toward \u201cTAG\u201d:\xa0 Study the "The Transcendental Argument for the existence of God\u201d at\xa0https://carm.org/transcendental-argument\nAs it relates to the \u201cTAG\u201d issue, see: "The Christian Worldview, the Atheist Worldview, and Logic\u201d\xa0https://carm.org/christian-worldview-atheist-worldview-and-logic\nBrief mention was made of: THE INFLUENCE:\xa0\xa0 A novel of fiction by\xa0Matt Slick\xa0detailing the spiritual battle of a man who is helped by an angel.\xa0 But in order to learn the answers and prevail, he must face his greatest test. Truth is sometimes challenging. Get your copy of \u201cTHE INFLUENCE \u201cat: Amazon and B&N\n\u201cRed Pill Christians\u201d were mentioned and seems to be a questionable group at first glance. \xa0However further examination will be necessary to determine an accurate evaluation.\nA review of the frequent topic of Free Will was discussed.\nGreat information on this topic in these two articles: \u201cWhat is free will?\u201d https://carm.org/what-is-free-will\xa0 and: \u201cWhat is compatibilist free will?\u201d https://carm.org/questions-compatibilist-free-will\nFree Will connected in relationship to Inspiration was examined:\xa0 Dictionary of Theology \u203a Inspiration\xa0https://carm.org/dictionary-inspiration\nWhat is meant by the inspiration of the Scriptures?\xa0https://carm.org/what-is-meant-by-ins...\nThe issue of the \u201cHarvest\u201d in apocalyptic literature (Specifically in The Book of Revelation)\nFor an expanded look at this topic please see:\xa0 "Are the good or the wicked taken first when Jesus returns?" https://carm.org/are-the-good-or-the-wicked-taken-first-when-jesus-returns\xa0 \nThere was a great deal of chat in regards to Monotheism and verses of Scripture which may need to be examined carefully.\nHow many Gods are there, one or many?\xa0https://carm.org/how-many-gods-are-th...\nPsalm 82\xa0is what's called an imprecatory Psalm.\xa0 In other words, it is a Psalm of condemnation and judgment against the unrighteous.\nPsalm 82:6 is given a better look at:\xa0https://carm.org/psalm826-mormon-jehovahs-witness\nSee more about this in the article: "Why should I only believe in one God? By Luke Wayne" https://carm.org/why-should-i-only-believe-in-one-god\nThe conversation naturally progressed to understanding of the claim of Deity as made by Jesus and the rejection to the claim by some at the time.\nStudy this further at "John 10:30-33, What made the Jews want to kill Jesus?\n"\xa0\xa0https://carm.org/john-1030-33-what-made-jews-want-kill-jesus\nJohn 8:58 and John 10:30 are examined at that link:\xa0https://carm.org/john-1030-33-what-made-jews-want-kill-jesus\nTo review exactly "What are the imprecatory Psalms?\u201d you may examine this topic further at:\xa0https://carm.org/what-are-the-imprecatory-psalms\nA chat participant who would not come on the microphone and who identified themselves as \u201cMost Holy Family Monastery\u201d failed to take up the various and repeated invitations to participate in audio.\nThe brothers Peter and Michael Dimond are most popularly identified in connection to the Most Holy Family Monastery and are not \u201cRoman Catholic\u201d in the conventional sense.\nThey are sedevacantist. It is the position held by a small portion of traditional Catholics who claim that the Papal Seat, the Holy See, has been vacant since around 1960.\nModern Roman Catholics sometimes view Sedevacantism as an altered style of a \u201cProtestant\u201d denomination. See more at: \u201cWhat is sedevacantism?\xa0 https://carm.org/questions-sedevacantism\nMoving on from the shallow venture into Roman Catholicism, some Marriage issues were discussed in generalities.\nThe chat was then guided back to the topic of Roman Catholicism as a chat participant (Another \u201ctext only\u201d with no audio participation) attempted to promote and defend some of the more common Roman Catholic teachings and doctrines.