BROADCASTS.com

b'19-368 FORD MOTOR CO. V. MONTANA EIGHTH DISTRICT COURT\\nDECISION BELOW: 443 P.3d 407 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: OP 19-0099\\n\\nQUESTION PRESENTED:\\nThe Due Process Clause permits a state court to exercise specific personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant only when the plaintiff\\u2019s claims\\u201carise out of or relate to" the defendant\'s forum activities.Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 472 (1985) (internal quotation marks omitted).\\n\\nThe question presented is:\\n1. Whether the\\u201carise out of or relate to" requirement is met when none of the defendant\'s forum contacts caused the plaintiff\\u2019s claims, such that the plaintiff\\u2019s claims would be the same even if the defendant had no forum contacts.\\n\\n\\n\\n19-369 FORD MOTOR CO. V. BANDEMER\\nDECISION BELOW: 931 N.W.2d 744 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: A17-1182\\n\\nQUESTION PRESENTED:\\nThe Due Process Clause permits a state court to exercise specific personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant only when the plaintiff\\u2019s claims\\u201carise out of or relate to" the defendant\'s forum activities.Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 472 (1985) (internal quotation marks omitted).\\n\\nThe question presented is:\\n1. Whether the\\u201carise out of or relate to" requirement is met when none of the defendant\'s forum contacts caused the plaintiff\\u2019s claims, such that the plaintiff\\u2019s claims would be the same even if the defendant had no forum contacts.\\n\\nSUPPORT what we are doing here by contributing to our Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/supremecourt'