b'
Science isn\'t perfect and one of it\'s biggest problems revolves around the publishing process, by which scientists share their findings with the public after peer review.\\xa0 However, this sharing can be quite limited in both what is shared and who gets to see it.\\xa0 Open access science, shared publicly, can enhance the discovery process, but implementing open access can be difficult.\\xa0 We talk about new systems that could accommodate open access publishing, revamped peer review, and even the publishing of null results.\\xa0 Null results in science are often shelved for decades, unseen by those who could use the information to avoid costly experiments already proven fruitless by others.\\xa0
About Sander
Sander is a 2nd year cognitive neuroscience master student at Maastricht University (Netherlands) working on transcranial alternating current stimulation, neuronal oscillations, entrainment and perception.
Learn about the research institute,\\xa0Maastricht University, where he works and studies.
Contact Sander at his email sandervb@outlook.com or on Facebook.
Publisher copyright policies & self-archiving
Visit the Sherpa/Romeo website to search which journals allow pre-prints and the conditions that come along with it.
Post-Publication Peer Review
Read the paper by Nikolaus Kriegeskorte on open evaluation and the benefits of a transparent reviewing process
Hear a lecture by Nikolaus Kriegeskorte on rethinking the structure of peer review
Three-minute rundown of Nikolaus Kriegeskorte\'s vision of a new peer review model
More websites
ResearchGate\\xa0to advance your research and read publications
Biorxiv\\xa0the preprint server for biology
\\xa0
Any other questions?\\xa0\\xa0Let us know!\\xa0 We appreciate your feedback.
You can now support the podcast at\\xa0https://www.patreon.com/sfspodcast.\\xa0 Many thanks to our past and present supporters!\\xa0
Thanks to\\xa0Plant Warrior\\xa0for their support.\\xa0 Use discount code SFS10 at checkout for 10% off your purchase of plant-based protein.
'