Assessment and the Status Quo: The Pros and Cons of the Standardized Assessment

Published: Aug. 31, 2020, 4 p.m.

Get .1 ASHA CEU here

You are preparing for a speech and language evaluation. You’ve read through the client / student’s file, (previous IEP, intake form, etc.), maybe you’ve conducted an interview with other stakeholders, and you have the general sketch of what issues need to be assessed. You start thinking about how you want to measure these areas. Likely you are thinking about which tests you might want to give and why. Every SLP has gone through this process, and most of us move forward with the assessment prioritizing the use of norm-referenced tests.

We as SLPs heavily rely on norm-referenced measures (per several articles we reviewed). While norm-referenced measures have their place and serve a very specific purpose, these tests are not well suited to designing individualized treatment. In this episode we dive into the literature to explore the pros and cons of the standardized assessment, when they serve a purpose, and why they should not be used to drive individualized treatment plans.

Join us, be our nerdy friends and take a dive into the literature (in our time machine back to 1991). Let’s explore the culture of norm-referenced assessments, why it is the way it is and what we can (and should) do about it.

This episode is offered for 1 ASHA CMH (equal to .1 ASHA CEU). If you have questions about CEUs or how this works, please see our How It Works or ASHA Professional Development pages.

Learning Outcomes

1. Identify at least 1 ethical underpinnings of assessment and the overall purpose of assessments

2. Identify at least 2 fundamental components of assessment

3. Identify at least 3 components of a standardized assessment and how to report use of any modifications

References

Austin, L. (2010). Dynamic Assessment: Whys and Hows. Perspectives on School-Based Issues, 11(3), 80-87. doi:10.1044/sbi11.3.80

Eichstadt, T. (2016). Best Assessment Ever? You. The ASHA Leader, 21(3), 32-33. doi:10.1044/leader.scm.21032016.32

Ebert, K. D., & Pham, G. (2017). Synthesizing Information From Language Samples and Standardized Tests in School-Age Bilingual Assessment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48(1), 42-55. doi:10.1044/2016_lshss-16-0007

Fulcher-Rood, K., Castilla-Earls, A., & Higginbotham, J. (2019). Diagnostic Decisions in Child Language Assessment: Findings From a Case Review Assessment Task. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50(3), 385-398. doi:10.1044/2019_lshss-18-0044

Maloney, E. S., & Larrivee, L. S. (2007). Limitations of Age-Equivalent Scores in Reporting the Results of Norm-Referenced Tests. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 34(Fall), 86-93. doi:10.1044/cicsd_34_f_86

Prath, S. (2019). Using Informal Measures to Separate Language Impairment From Language Influence When Working With Diverse Students. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 4(5), 1121-1127. doi:10.1044/2019_pers-sig16-2019-0002

Power-Defur, L., & Flynn, P. (2012). Unpacking the Standards for Intervention. Perspectives on School-Based Issues, 13(1), 11-16. doi:10.1044/sbi13.1.11

Wilson, K. S., Blackmon, R. C., Hall, R. E., & Elcholtz, G. E. (1991). Methods of Language Assessment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22(4), 236-241. doi:10.1044/0161-1461.2204.236

Online Resources

ASHA Practice Portal: Assessment Tools, Techniques, and Data Sources: https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/late-language-emergence/assessment-tools-techniques-and-data-sources/

The Informed SLP: https://www.theinformedslp.com/qa_standardized_tests.html

Disclosures:

Financial: Kate Grandbois is the owner / founder of Grandbois Therapy + Consulting, LLC and co-founder of SLP Nerdcast. Amy Wonkka is an employee of a public school system and co-founder of SLP Nerdcast.

Non-financial: Kate and Amy are both members of ASHA, SIG 12, and both serve on the AAC Advisory Group for Massachusetts Advocates for Children. Kate is a member of the Berkshire Association for Behavior Analysis and Therapy (BABAT), MassABA, the Association for Behavior Analysis International (ABAI) and the corresponding Speech Pathology and Applied Behavior Analysis SIG.

Time Ordered Agenda:

10 minutes: Introduction, Disclaimers and Disclosures

20 minutes: Review the ethical underpinnings of assessment and the overall purpose of assessments

15 minutes: Identify the fundamental components of assessment

10 minutes: Identify the components of a standardized assessment and how to report use of any modifications

5 minutes: Summary and Closing

Disclaimer

The contents of this episode are not meant to replace clinical advice. SLP Nerdcast, its hosts and guests do not represent or endorse specific products or procedures mentioned during our episodes unless otherwise stated. We are NOT PhDs, but we do research our material. We do our best to provide a thorough review and fair representation of each topic that we tackle. That being said, it is always likely that there is an article we’ve missed, or another perspective that isn’t shared. If you have something to add to the conversation, please email us! Wed love to hear from you!

__

SLP Nerdcast is a podcast for busy SLPs and teachers who need ASHA continuing education credits, CMHs, or professional development. We do the reading so you don’t have to! Leave us a review if you feel so inclined!

We love hearing from our listeners. Email us at info@slpnerdcast.com anytime! You can find our complaint policy here. You can also:

Follow us on instagram

Follow us on facebook

We are thrilled to be listed in the Top 25 SLP Podcasts! Thank you FeedSpot!