BROADCASTS.com

b'Josh, Liz and Gabi stayed after the two episode shoot and responded to arguments for and against Bryan Kemper\'s picture, from both pro-life and pro-choice people. Here are the arguments we covered: "We\\xa0wouldn\'t\\xa0hesitate to make [the Aurora] comparison if it were three year olds." \\u201cIt\\u2019s the 4,000 a day that are being minimized; this is a good opportunity to make the stats meaningful to people.\\u201d \\u201cBabies are dying and we should do whatever it takes to end the apathy.\\u201d \\u201cNo comparisons are needed if both events are inherently wrong.\\u201d Josh tells a story about what he recently told pro-choice people that reject ALL analogies to slavery and the Holocaust. Nick on Facebook: \\u201cIf [the picture] leads to the question, \'well what makes killing a born person different from killing the unborn,\' than it helps advance the discussion for unborn rights. Comparing abortion to say infanticide may help make the comparison seem more apparent. Yes some people will be turned off, but people are always turned off by the pro-life message." Kelly on Facebook: "I believe these comparisons are basically good (usually) and, many times, necessary. Like any good teacher would do, in explaining a pro-life view to a non pro-lifer, one must use examples & images of familiar things in order to reach the student where he/she is. What better way than to use an example from the media that everyone (well, almost everyone) knows about? It almost doesn\'t matter if they initially respond negatively; they certainly won\'t forget it!" Andrew on facebook: \\u201cMy question for prolifers is do you think it\\u2019s appropriate for the media to talk about the \'need for gun control\' after this tragedy? I feel its a double standard." Jessica (pro-choice): "I will\\xa0whole heartily\\xa0admit abortion kills. But to that person, whom was carrying that fetus, they felt terminating that pregnancy was needed or else they wouldn\'t have done it, its not a choice taken lightly. I feel like comparing a random killing spree by a mad man to the termination of life within one\\u2019s womb is a stretch. And probably offensive to those involved. \'Oh, your son was shot in the head? That\'s totally like this aborted fetus over here.\'" Greg: (personally pro-life) "On another page somebody compared the right to having an abortion to the right to removing or treating cancer. I cannot imagine a pro-choice person looking at this picture thinking, \'Oh, no! I never realized women who abort or the doctors who perform abortions could be equated to mass murderers. I\'m switching sides! Thanks for the heads up.\' The same way I can\'t see pro-life people reading the cancer comparison and saying \'Oh, I see now. I don\'t want to live with cancer. People should be able to have all of the abortions they want. Thanks for explaining it in that way.\'" Angela: \\u200e(reacting to caption under Bryan\\u2019s pic) "Some may say it is wrong to compare these two issues. So what, we don\'t care about people\'s feelings. GO PRO LIFE!" Lindy: (pro-life) "I guess I don\'t like the word "murder" in pro-life graphics. I think 1) it turns people off extremely fast and 2) technically "murder" is the illegal taking of a life, which abortion isn\\u2019t."'