BROADCASTS.com

b'Leaders from around the globe are meeting in Scotland today for the COP26 summit, talking about ways to speed up efforts to fight global warming. Yet even the optimists in Glasgow admit that the scientific consensus is that it\\u2019s already too late to cut emissions fast enough to avoid a dangerous rise in the earth\\u2019s temperature by 2 degrees Celsius, which is expected to lead to severe droughts, blistering heat waves, deadly flooding, and rising seas. \\n\\nDespite these dire predictions, there has been one potential weapon in humanity\\u2019s anti-warming arsenal that, in terms of practical research, has been a taboo subject: solar geoengineering. Now Professor David Keith says it\\u2019s time for that to change. Keith is an award-winning physicist who holds professorships at both Harvard Kennedy School and Harvard\\u2019s School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. Working at the intersection of physics and policy, Keith is a pioneer in the field, which involves making man-made changes to the atmosphere that would cool the planet by either preventing some of the sun\\u2019s energy from getting through, or making it easier for heat already in the atmosphere to escape.\\n\\nCritics have had a tough time wrapping their heads around solar geoengineering. They call it the stuff of science fiction, say it could be used as an excuse not to further cut emissions, and even suggest that governments might someday use it as a weapon. But Keith says that it\\u2019s now time to explore it as one of major strategies to fight warming, which include cutting emissions, capturing the carbon that\\u2019s already in the atmosphere, and helping people and societies adapt to the effects already being felt. One of his primary arguments for starting serious research on solar geoengineering is inequality. After all, he says, planetary warming doesn\\u2019t play fair. It is mostly people in the world\\u2019s poorest countries who will suffer the worst harm from a warming climate, yet they are the least responsible for it in terms of per capita emissions. And amid all the recent talk of climate adaptation, there is comparatively little mention that it is much easier for a rich country in a colder latitude to adapt than it is for a developing one in a hotter region. \\n\\nKeith is also known for his work on carbon capture and founded a company working on technology to pull carbon from the air \\u2014 although he says that is at best a long-term strategy that could take decades to have any beneficial effect.'