Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.11.14.383240v1?rss=1 Authors: Selechnik, D., Richardson, M. F., Hess, M., Hess, A. S., Dodds, K. G., Martin, M., Chan, T. C., Cardilini, A. P. A., Sherman, C., Shine, R., Rollins, L. A. Abstract: As technological advancements enhance our ability to study population genetics, we must understand how the intrinsic properties of our datasets influence the decisions we make when designing experiments. Filtering parameter thresholds, such as call rate and minimum minor allele frequency (MAF), are known to affect inferences of population structure in reduced representation sequencing (RRS) studies. However, it is unclear to what extent the impacts of these parameter choices vary across datasets. Here, we reviewed literature on filtering choices and levels of genetic differentiation across RRS studies on wild populations to highlight the diverse approaches that have been used. Next, we hypothesized that choices in filtering thresholds would have the greatest impact when analyzing datasets with low levels of genetic differentiation between populations. To test this hypothesis, we produced seven simulated RRS datasets with varying levels of population structure, and analyzed them using four different combinations of call rate and MAF. We performed the same analysis on two empirical RRS datasets (low or high population structure). Our simulated and empirical results suggest that the effects of filtering choices indeed vary based on inherent levels of differentiation: specifically, choosing stringent filtering choices was important to detect distinct populations that were slightly differentiated, but not those that were highly differentiated. As a result, experimental design and analysis choices need to consider attributes of each specific dataset. Based on our literature review and analyses, we recommend testing a range of filtering parameter choices, and presenting all results with clear justification for ultimate filtering decisions used in downstream analyses. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info