BROADCASTS.com

b'We all do things that we wish we had not done. Those are usually called \\u201cLearning Experiences,\\u201d unless the event creates a catastrophic backlash or questions the leader\\u2019s integrity.\\n\\n\\nWe can use whatever words we want to use, however, in some circumstances those words might create negative results that diminish the credibility of the leader. Choice of words is power, and choice of words is integrity, especially for the entrepreneur and thought leader who must establish a position of influence to support a niche.\\n\\nHere is my list of behaviors that bring down leaders in any type of organization:\\n\\n* Ignoring Signs of Problems: There are many reasons that leaders don\\u2019t respond to issues that arise in day-to-day activities. First, the leader is unsure of what to do when surprised by unexpected actions or results. The top reason I observe for leaders at any level not responding to unacceptable behaviors or actions is a fear of not being liked. The script that leaders play to themselves is that they must be liked for people to want to follow them. That\\u2019s not true. It\\u2019s important for people to respect the leader and trust in the leader\\u2019s abilities in order to be an active participant. A musical analogy for this dynamic is this: the conductor stops the rehearsal and points out that the trumpets are too loud and that the flutes are not in tune. The conductor presents these as facts and not as a personal criticism. The conductor then defines the prescription to the problem as follows: trumpets, take the dynamics down one level and flutes, you are slightly flat. The players are not offended and the rest of the orchestra is not horrified. It\\u2019s just the reverse. If the conductor did not address the problems and provide the solution, then they would be considered a poor leader. Leaders in business could benefit from this model. Define the problem. Address it as soon as possible. Be factual and specific in the analysis of the problem as well as the solution. It\\u2019s possible because the orchestra has established a culture of high-performance standards that everyone understands and supports. Tip: Deal with the problem as soon as it is noticed or the problem only gets worse, costs money, wastes time, and damages relationships.\\n* Cutting off Team Members with Ideas: It\\u2019s only the insecure leader who doesn\\u2019t want to gain the perspective of others on the team. If the leader can\\u2019t respect the opinion of team members, then it might time to get a new team. Tip: Don\\u2019t attempt to be right all the time; instead, work to make others always right. This way time and energy are available to focus on the top leadership priorities that only the top leader can do.\\n* Taking Back a Delegated Project: Nothing is more damaging to team spirit and personal initiative than the leader who takes back a project or assignment to do themselves. There are two messages implied in this action: 1) the person to whom it has been assigned is not capable of successfully completing the project; or 2) that there is no chance of anyone other than the leader being successful. This is a no-win action. There is a full set of leadership competencies tied to delegation. Most leaders do not even know that these competencies exist and certainly don\\u2019t know that they are needed. Tip: Learn about the reciprocity of leadership over-functioning and team under-functioning. Teams under-function mostly because the leader does it all. What\\u2019s the point of even trying?\\n* Valuing Results and Not Individuals: Effective leadership depends on effective relationships. Value results. Emphasize results. Focus on results. And constantly work on relationships. Tip: Learn to develop healthy boundaries so relationships don\\u2019t depend on people \\u201cliking\\u201d the leader,\\nLearn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices'