State v. Alger, A18-1000
b'Pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant James Martin Alger, Sr., pleaded guilty to two counts of violating an order for protection (OFP). As part of his factual basis, Alger admitted that he violated the OFP by having contact with his ex-girlfriend and their minor son. He also agreed that he would receive two sentences, which would be served consecutively. The district court imposed sentences that were consistent with the parties\\u2019 agreement. On appeal, Alger argued that the imposition of two sentences was unlawful under Minn. Stat. \\xa7 609.035 (2018). The court of appeals affirmed the sentences, relying on the multiple-victim rule.\\n\\nOn appeal to the supreme court, the issue presented is whether multiple sentences for OFP violations arising from a single incident may be permitted under the multiple-victim rule. (Crow Wing County)'