Google Accused of Union-Busting

Published: Dec. 23, 2019, 3 p.m.

b'

Don\\u2019t be evil.\\xa0

Up until last year, those words were not only part of Google\\u2019s official Code of Conduct, but served as their longstanding, albeit unofficial motto. However, recent actions seem to be calling that phrase\\u2019s legacy at Google into question.

The company\\u2019s firing of the recently dubbed Thanksgiving Four, has led the National Labor Relations Board to launch an investigation into the Mountain View, California technology giant. The controversy surrounding these employees stemmed from the collective\\u2019s outspoken views about organizing a union. Google stated that these individual\\u2019s pro-union activities had nothing to do with their firing, because they were let go due to \\u201cintentional and often repeated violations of long-standing data security policies, including systematically accessing and disseminating other employees\\u2019 materials and work.\\u201d\\xa0

The four have denied these charges and allege that Google retroactively applied new data protection rules to previous actions. The complaint was filled for these four individuals by the Communications Workers of America union and the AFL-CIO.\\xa0

According to a recent Bloomberg.com report, one element not helping Google\\u2019s case is the apparent use of an internal monitoring tool that automatically reports employees who create a calendar event that encompassing more than 10 rooms or 100 participants. Google\\u2019s parent company, Alphabet, states this is simply a way to ensure resources are being used responsibly.\\xa0

However, this type of alarm, coupled with Google\\u2019s recent hiring of IRI Consultants, a well-known, NYC-based law firm that has a reputation for helping large healthcare providers steer clear of union formation, has many questioning the company\\u2019s true motives. The company\\u2019s connection to IRI was discovered and made public by anonymous employees.\\xa0

The union talk at Google stems from what some feel is the need to protect employees who have protested the company\\u2019s handling of sexual harassment complaints and its work with the Department of Homeland Security.\\xa0

The NRLB is now charged with investigating the merit of the complaint, and if it makes sense to proceed with charges.

Download and listen to the audio version below and click here to subscribe to the Today in Manufacturing podcast.

'