BROADCASTS.com

b'Hey everyone!\\n First off, please subscribe to the show by clicking this link.\\xa0\\n Today we discussed this weekend\'s clash between members of ANTIFA and member of the "Proud Boys."\\xa0\\n Antifa claims to stand against Fascism, but they stand against that fascism with the use of violent Communism. Throughout history, neither of those ideologies have been beneficial for the ordinary individual.\\xa0\\n It\'s time for law enforcement in Portland, OR to step up and arrest these people. We fully support your right to protest, but if you are removing rights from others, then you need to be subjected to the full extend of the law. If government has one job, it\'s to make sure that we are all safe, and it\'s clear innocent bystanders in Portland are not safe.\\xa0\\n We also discussed our local high school back home in Illinois, and their decision to subject students to random drug screenings.\\xa0\\n The administration of Vienna High School has announced plans to conduct randomized drug screenings on their student body. The plan will assign a number to each student, and randomly draw numbers throughout the year. Let me first say that we absolutely agree that teenagers should not be doing drugs, and we appreciate the intent behind this new policy.\\xa0\\n However, these drug screenings should not be mandatory. Meaning, the students\' parents should have the right to opt their children out of the program. As of right now, "consent" will be considered as participation in extra-curricular activities, or driving your own vehicle to school.\\xa0\\n The implied consent by participation in extra-curricular activities is closer to agreeable in my book, being that it is your choice to join or not join those activities. On the contrast, implied consent by way of "you drive your car to school" is further out of bounds, considering the fact that you are faced to attend the school. Were this a private school implementing the policy, I would be 100% on board, since you chose to attend that school.\\xa0\\n There\'s a fine line being treaded with this policy. On one hand, it\'s morally defendable that this policy be included in your child\'s schooling, but on the other, it\'s removing your right as a parent to consent to your child being swabbed, or to their urine being collected by school officials.\\xa0\\n To me, it\'s not obvious that this policy will have the desired effect. When I was in high school, it was considered "cool" to break the rules. Any seemingly arbitrary rule was a target for rebellion among the students. Your "cool" points were likely to go up if you found ways around them, potentially leading to a higher social status. Sometimes, we broke rules that we would have not otherwise broken, if they weren\'t rules.\\xa0\\n I would be slightly worried of an adverse effect from this new policy. That is, the possibility that students will attempt to break this rule, when they might not otherwise have participated in the dangerous acts in the first place.\\xa0\\n Responsibility\\n We talk a lot about responsibility on our podcast. In our eyes, the refusal to accept responsibility in all facets of life has lead to the societal situations we see playing out in politics right now.\\xa0\\n When do the responsibilities of the parents end, and the responsibilities of the schools begin? In my eyes, this is yet another attempt to remove parental responsibilities from parents, and place them on arbitrary rules set by government (the school).\\xa0\\n If I were a parent, I would sign a consent for if given the opportunity by my child\'s school. That however does not mean that I believe all the other children should be forced to do so.\\n Drug testing kits ca\\n\\n--- \\n\\nSupport this podcast: https://anchor.fm/goodmorningliberty/support\\nLearn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices'