BROADCASTS.com

b'EBV is a \\u03b3-herpes virus which is able to infect human resting B-cells and to transform them into permanently growing lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs). EBNA2 (Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2) is one of the first viral proteins expressed after in vitro infection and interacts with different cellular proteins like RBP-J\\u03ba and PU.1. The EBNA2 protein acts as a transcriptional activator of the viral Latent Membrane Proteins 1 and 2 (LMP1 and LMP2) and the viral nuclear genes EBNA1, EBNA3A, -3B, -3C, EBNA-LP. Additionally EBNA2 is also able to transactivate cellular genes like CD21, CD23 or c-myc. To study the different EBNA2 target genes and the function of EBNA2 a LCL was established (ER/EB2-5 cells, Kempkes et al., 1995) harboring an estrogen-inducible EBNA2. In the presence of estrogen the ER/EBNA2 fusion protein (estrogen receptor binding domain) is located in the nucleus were EBNA2 can transactivate its target genes, whereas in the absence of estrogen the ER/EBNA2 fusion protein is kept in the cytoplasm and therefore inactive. The cells proliferate in the presence of estrogen and they arrest in the absence resulting in a phenotype similar to resting B-lymphocytes. By using the ER/EB2-5 cell line I could clearly show that the cell surface molecule CD83, belonging to the immunoglobuline superfamily (Zhou et al., 1992), is upregulated after the activation of EBNA2. By using a derivative ER/EB2-5 cell line that constitutively expressed LMP1 I could show that CD83 is still expressed even in the absence of functional EBNA2 suggesting that LMP1, the viral target gene of EBNA2, is responsible for the induction of CD83. Therefore I analysed the activation of the CD83 promoter by LMP1.\\nLMP1 is a transmembrane protein with a short intracellular N-terminus, 6 hydrophobic transmembrane domains and a long intracellular C-terminus, containing C-terminal activator regions CTAR1, 2 and 3. The different CTAR regions are responsible for activating genes via NF-\\u03baB, ATF, AP1 and STAT signaling pathways. For the activation of its target genes LMP1 uses the same signaling molecules (TRAF, TRADD) as family members of the TNF-R family (CD40, TNF-R1, TNF-R2). The CD83 promoter was activated by LMP1 as shown by promoter luciferase reporter assays in 293-T cells. The induction was not observed in the absence of a NF-\\u03baB binding site in a CD83 promoter mutant. Furthermore LMP1 mutants which are mutated in the binding regions for TRAF2 (CTAR1) or TRADD (CTAR2) are not able to transactivate the CD83 promoter. By co-transfection of LMP1 and dominant/negative I\\u03baB the CD83 promoter could not be activated because of inactivation of NF-\\u03baB. These experiments clearly demonstrate that the CD83 promoter is transactivated by LMP1 via NF-\\u03baB. \\nAdditionally to the regulation of CD83 I was also interested in the functional role of CD83. Until now only little is known about the function of CD83. CD83 seems to have a specific role in the decision to single positive CD4+ T-cells in the thymus (Fujimoto et al., 2002). I have tested a possible co-stimulatory function of CD83 to CD4+ T-cells by retroviral expression of CD83 in non-professional antigen presenting cells (RCC). Indeed CD83 expression increased the CD4+ response in comparison to CD80 or GFP retroviral infected RCC cells. In mixed lymphocyte reactions this co-stimulatory effect could not be clearly demonstrated although a soluble CD83-Ig showed a small inhibitory influence. \\nThe identification of a CD83 ligand molecule could give new insights into the function of CD83. Therefore a CD83-Ig fusion protein as well as a CD83-tetramer construct were generated and used to screen for a potential ligand of CD83. First results showed that the CD83-Ig fusion protein and the CD83-tetramer construct bound to CD4+ and to CD8+ T-cells of isolated PBMCs as well as to activated T-cells in a culture of mixed T-cell populations.'