Zalma's Insurance Fraud Letter - 04-15-2021

Published: April 15, 2021, 3:31 p.m.

b'

ZIFL 4/15/2021

\\n

https://zalma.com/blog

\\n

Zalma\\u2019s Insurance Fraud Letter,  in its 25th year is free to anyone who  subscribes or goes to the Mr. Zalma\\u2019s Website where you can Subscribe to  e-mail Version of ZIFL, it\\u2019s Free!  Read last two issues of ZIFL  here.  Go to the Barry Zalma, Inc. web site here Videos from \\u201cBarry Zalma on  YouTube\\u201d   Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921  See the full video at https://rumble.com/vfnvcj-a-video-from-zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-april-15-2021.html and at https://youtu.be/zHkVc_ozTqs  Read the full issue of ZIFL at https://lnkd.in/dfGQHC3 and at https://lnkd.in/gfZwXxi There can Never be a Fraud Too Small to Void a Policy Material Misrepresentation Concerning the Extent of Loss Voids Policy  After the district court ruled for the defendant insurance company on  cross-motions for summary judgment, ending the action, the plaintiff  appealed that summary-judgment ruling. In Meat Town Inc. v. Sentinel  Insurance Company, Case No. 19-2351, United States Court of Appeals for  The Sixth Circuit (March 30, 2021) was asked to find the fraud wasn\\u2019t  big enough to stop the insured from collecting the remainder of its  loss. Two Types of Soft Fraud that are Ignored \\u201cGOOD CAUSE\\u201d FRAUD  Morally and criminally, insurance fraud is always wrongful. Many people,  within the insurance industry and outside it, believe that because  insurers are so well funded that there are good causes for committing  insurance fraud. A frightening trend is emerging where judges, jurors  and administrative law courts are refusing to convict or hold  responsible perpetrators of fraud if the court is convinced that the  fraud is for a good cause. Good News From the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud Health Insurance Fraud Convictions Criminal Must Pay Restitution Order  Mr. Speights was a very bad man who pled guilty to multiple criminal  acts causing damage to the victims. Ohio has logically stated that a  crime victim who is reimbursed by an insurer for its losses should not  receive restitution. What they fail to understand is that, if the losses  are insured, then the insurer is the victim and entitled to any payment  of restitution since, allowing an insured to receive indemnity from its  insurer and restitution would unjustly enrich the victim who should  turn over anything received to its insurer. Other Insurance Fraud Convictions  \\xa9 2021 \\u2013 Barry Zalma

\\n\\n--- \\n\\nSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/barry-zalma/support'