b'
When You Win it is Best to Shut Up and Accept It
\\nAs a young lawyer one of the first things I learned was never argue with a judge whose tentative ruling is to grant your motion. Insurers often seek, when there is a dispute of insurance coverage, declaratory relief from the court about its duty to defend or indemnify the insured. However, when there is no claim, it is a waste of the time of counsel, the insured and the courts to bring a declaratory relief action.
\\nThe axiom to never argue over a win was explained by the USDC for the Eastern District of Virginia, in Hanover Insurance Company, et al. v. C. David Venture Management, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-790 (RDA/JFA), United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division (August 30, 2022). Hanover sought a ruling it owed neither defense nor indemnity to the defendants. The defendants, David Venture Management, LLC and Venture Street, LLC\'s (\\u201cDefendants\\u201d) moved to dismiss The Hanover American Insurance Company\'s (\\u201cPlaintiffs\\u201d or \\u201cHanover\\u201d) suit.
\\nBACKGROUND
\\nThe lawsuit for Declaratory Judgment implicates Hanover\'s potential duties to defend or indemnify Defendants in a putative class action brought in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. Beginning on December 9, 2017, Hanover issued the first of several Commercial General Liability (\\u201cCGL\\u201d) policies to CDVM. Hanover also issued Commercial Follow Form Excess and Umbrella Policies (\\u201cExcess/Umbrella Policy\\u201d) for the same effective dates. Defendant Venture Street was added as an additional named insured on the CGL and Excess/Umbrella Policy effective May 29, 2019.
\\n\\n--- \\n\\nSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/barry-zalma/support'