BROADCASTS.com

b'

Judgment in Favor of Insurer Because of Plaintiff\\u2019s Sloth

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gVRkNvR2 and see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gfgqe9nM and at https://lnkd.in/gmGuUhXs and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4300 posts.

Judgment in Favor of Insurer Because of Plaintiff\\u2019s Sloth

See the full video at https://rumble.com/v1j7gb7-untimely-suit-dismissed.html and at

Michelle J. Pollard, appealed from the summary judgment rendered by  the trial court in favor of the defendant, Geico General Insurance  Company, on the plaintiffs complaint seeking to recover underinsured  motorist benefits. On appeal, the plaintiff claimed that the court  improperly determined that the accidental failure of suit statute,  General Statutes \\xa7 52-592 (a), did not apply to revive her otherwise  time barred action.

In Michelle J. Pollard v. Geico General Insurance Company, No. AC  44560, Court of Appeals of Connecticut (September 6, 2022) the defendant  argued that judgment was appropriately rendered and asserted, as an  alternative ground contended that the plaintiff\\u2019s action was barred  because she failed under the terms of the parties\\u2019 insurance policy to  commence suit timely or to invoke the policy\\u2019s tolling provision.