b'
A Video Explaining Insurance for Construction Defects Regarding Structural Failures
\\n\\nStructural integrity failures can involve any of the following: concrete; masonry; carpentry; or foundations. Defects related to site preparation can be caused by any of the following: building on expansive soil or other defective soils incapable of properly supporting structures; building on contaminated soils; lack of a slab-on-grade foundation when the soils are acidic and can cause the deterioration of concrete; or building on improperly compacted soils, which can cause interior distress to cabinets and countertops, make doors difficult to open and cause structures to settle and cracking in stucco, drywall, plaster interior walls, windows, tile floors, concrete flatwork, slabs, and garage flooring.
\\nIn Texas, when a completed home developed problems with a shifting foundation, a suit was filed alleging violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) and negligence. On the first day of trial, the plaintiff settled with one defendant and proceeded against another. The District Court granted a directed verdict on the claim that there was a violation of the DTPA with a breach of an implied warranty of good-and-workmanlike performance. Only the plaintiff\\u2019s negligence claim was submitted to the jury, which found no negligence on defendant\\u2019s part. The district court rendered a take-nothing judgment. [Codner v. Arellano, 40 S.W.3d 666 (Tex.App. Dist.3 2001). See also Parmely v. Hildebrand, S.D. 83, 630 N.W.2d 509 (2001), where the seller was found to have made adequate disclosures about expansive soils at time of sale and was not liable for soil expansion damages.]
\\nThe Ninth Circuit, dealing with the right to insurance for damages caused by expansive soil, found that under California law, a latent defect exclusion applies to third party negligence that is discoverable only through subsequent intensive expert investigation. Because there is no evidence that the contractor\\u2019s negligence in this case was discoverable, short of an in-depth expert inspection after-the-fact, the Ninth Circuit concluded that State Farm was entitled to summary judgment on its exclusion for latent defects. [Winans v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., 968 F.2d 884 (9th Cir. 1992).]
\\n\\xa9 2021 \\u2013 Barry Zalma
\\n\\n--- \\n\\nSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/barry-zalma/support'