b'
Lack of Insurable Interest Makes Life Policy Void from Inception
\\nPolicy Acquired as Part of a STOLI Fraud Never Existed as a Matter of Law
\\nRELEVANT FACTS AND BACKGROUND On July 11, 2007, the fictitious Mansour Seck Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (the "Seck Trust") applied to MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company (Brighthouse\'s predecessor) for a $5 million universal life insurance policy insuring the life of a fictitious man identified as Mansour Seck (the "Policy"), with a birthday of January 1, 1933.
\\nSeck was identified as a French citizen residing at 170 Academy Street, Jersey City, New Jersey. After confirming that its procedures and guidelines were met, MetLife issued the Policy on or around July 24, 2007. Pape Seck\'s Arrest and Prosecution In 2010, Pape Seck was the subject of numerous press releases issued by the State of New Jersey and other insurance industry publications; they stated that Pape Michael Seck, a New York City insurance agent, had been arrested and prosecuted for fraudulent insurance schemes. Pape Seck pleaded guilty to two counts of insurance fraud concerning fraudulent applications for Mansour Seck. T Litigation and the Superior Court Ruling In its opinion, the trial court declared the Policy void ab initio. The court denied Geronta\'s request for rescission and disgorgement, holding that rescission is not available where a contract is void because there is no contract to "unmake." After trial, the Superior Court ruled that Geronta was only entitled to restitution of the premiums it paid after it informed Brighthouse that the Policy was void for lack of an insurable interest.
\\n\\n--- \\n\\nSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/barry-zalma/support'