b'
Apple Annie Suffered no Direct Physical Damage
\\nIt\'s Time to Quit Trying to Get Business Interruption Payments from Insurers for Covid The COVID pandemic and ensuing lock down have generated a host of legal issues. One of the most momentous, in terms of the potential monetary liability, is whether businesses ordered by government decree to close or suspend operations could get compensation under the business income coverage of the standard comprehensive commercial liability policy. In Apple Annie, LLC v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Company, A163300, California Court of Appeals, First District, Second Division (September 2, 2022) the California Court of Appeal refused to be swayed by the Marina Pacific decision.
\\nBACKGROUND Apple Annie, LLC, operated restaurants in Marin, San Francisco, and Santa Barbara counties. Defendant Oregon Mutual Insurance Company issued Apple Annie a comprehensive commercial liability and property insurance policy that, as relevant here, promised in general to "pay for direct physical loss of or damage to Covered Property at the [insured] premises," and in particular to "pay for the actual loss of Business Income you sustain due to the necessary suspension of your \'operations\' during the \'period of restoration. The suspension must be caused by direct physical loss of or damage to property at the described premises. The loss or damage must be caused by or result from a Covered Cause of Loss."
\\nDISCUSSION After a comprehensive survey of the subject, the court concluded that a business that closed pursuant to a government shut-down order had not suffered "direct physical . . . damage to" the business\'s property. This was a matter of plain English: The presence of COVID-19 on Plaintiff\'s property did not cause damage to the property necessitating rehabilitation or restoration efforts similar to those required to abate asbestos or remove poisonous fumes which permeate property. Instead, all that is required for Plaintiff to return to full working order is for the [government orders and restrictions to be lifted. By contrast, the losses here arose from closures intended to limit the spread of a virus that can carry great risk to people but no risk at all to a physical structure.
\\n\\n--- \\n\\nSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/barry-zalma/support'