b'
Occurrence Must be an Accident
\\n\\nBeverly Weathersby appealed the trial court\'s order awarding summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) to plaintiff, Meemic Insurance Company (Meemic), and denying its insured, defendant Randal S. Ritchie, personal liability coverage under his homeowner\'s insurance policy. In Meemic Insurance Company v. Randal S. Ritchie, and Beverly Weathersby, No. 358929, Court of Appeals of Michigan (October 20, 2022) the Court of Appeals was asked to resolve the issue of coverage for a claimed assault under a homeowners policy.
\\nFACTUAL BACKGROUND
\\nThe case arose out of an unfortunate encounter between two strangers, whose stories of the incident vastly differ. As Weathersby tells it, while making a home visit in rural Coldwater as part of her job as a social worker, she became lost and her GPS erroneously sent her to Ritchie\'s house. She pulled her car into Ritchie\'s driveway and approached the home. Then, according to Weathersby, Ritchie came out of his house, approached her, and aggressively confronted her while pointing a gun directly at her at close range. Fearing for her life, Weathersby returned to her car and drove away. Weathersby brought a civil action against Ritchie, asserting that Ritchie committed the intentional tort of assault. She also claimed that Ritchie was negligent in an apparent effort to dip into Ritchie\'s insurance since is always intentional. She sought damages for the emotional distress and injury she sustained as a result of Ritchie\'s conduct. At the time of the incident, Ritchie was insured under a homeowner\'s policy issued by Meemic. The trial court denied coverage, ruling that Ritchie\'s act was not an "occurrence." LEGAL ANALYSIS The interpretation of an insurance contract is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. An insurance policy is an agreement between parties that a court interprets much the same as any other contract to best effectuate the intent of the parties and the clear, unambiguous language of the policy. The terms of a contract must be enforced as written where there is no ambiguity.
\\n\\n--- \\n\\nSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/barry-zalma/support'